Security Access ManagerApplication · Ibm

CVE-2023-30997

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-06-27
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.0.7.1 or later.
See remediation →
80/100
Remediation priority · High
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
IBM Security Access Manager Docker 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 could allow a local user to obtain root access due to improper access controls. IBM X-Force ID: 254638.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

IBM Security Access Manager Docker versions 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 contains a local privilege escalation vulnerability where improper access controls allow a local unprivileged user to gain root access to the container environment.

MitigationUpgrade to a patched version of IBM Security Access Manager Docker beyond 10.0.7.1, or apply vendor-supplied access control fixes. Review and harden file permissions and user role configurations within the container.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Security Access ManagerApplication
Affected:>= 10.0.0.0, <= 10.0.7.1

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify IBM Security Access Manager Docker container
    Run 'docker ps' or inspect the container environment to confirm the image name contains 'IBM Security Access Manager' or 'isam'
    Affected if The container is running an IBM Security Access Manager Docker image
  2. Check installed version
    Inside the container, run a command to display the ISAM version (e.g., 'grep version', check /opt/IBM directory, or use any available version query command). Compare the output to the affected range 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1
    Affected if The version number falls within 10.0.0.0 to 10.0.7.1 inclusive
  3. Inspect container user configuration
    Run 'docker exec <container> id' or 'cat /etc/passwd' inside the container to identify which users exist and their privilege levels. Check for non-root users that should not have elevated access
    Affected if Unprivileged users exist in the container who should not have access to sensitive resources
  4. Review file permissions on sensitive directories
    Run 'ls -la' on directories such as /opt/IBM, /var, or any configuration directories inside the container. Check if files or scripts are writable by non-root users
    Affected if Sensitive files or scripts are writable by unprivileged users, enabling privilege escalation
  5. Check for improper access control configurations
    Inspect configuration files related to user roles, permissions, or access control policies inside the container. Look for misconfigured settings that grant excessive permissions
    Affected if Access control configurations permit unprivileged users to modify system files or execute privileged operations

A user is affected if they are running IBM Security Access Manager Docker version 10.0.0.0 through 10.0.7.1 with unprivileged users present or improper file permissions that could enable local privilege escalation to root.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.0.7.1
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to a patched version of IBM Security Access Manager Docker beyond 10.0.7.1, or apply vendor-supplied access control fixes. Review and harden file permissions and user role configurations within the container.

Fix this in Security Access Manager Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
14.0 hours of engineering $2,490
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-30997 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-30997 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data