InlongApplication · Apache
CVE-2023-31064
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedFiles or Directories Accessible to External Parties vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong.This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.2.0 through 1.6.0. the user in InLong could cancel an application that doesn't belongs to it. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.7.0 or cherry-pick https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7799 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7799 to solve it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache InLong versions 1.2.0-1.6.0 contain an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) vulnerability where authenticated users can cancel applications belonging to other users due to missing or improper authorization checks on the application cancellation endpoint.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
InlongApplication
>= 1.2.0, <= 1.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Determine installed Apache InLong versionCheck the InLong version file or banner - typically found in the InLong dashboard UI or via API endpoint /api/inlong/manager/version or by inspecting the deployed JAR/WAR file metadataAffected if The installed version is >= 1.2.0 and <= 1.6.0
-
Identify application cancellation endpoint exposureReview API documentation or network traffic logs for calls to the application cancellation endpoint (typically /api/inlong/manager/application/cancel or similar path containing 'cancel' and 'application')Affected if The application cancellation endpoint is exposed and accessible to authenticated users
-
Verify authorization enforcement on cancellation operationsInspect the backend code or configuration for the cancellation endpoint to determine if user ownership validation exists - check if the logged-in user's ID is validated against the application owner's ID before processing cancellationAffected if No ownership/authorization check exists or can be bypassed for the cancellation operation
A user is affected if their InLong version is between 1.2.0 and 1.6.0 and the application cancellation endpoint lacks proper authorization controls to verify that the requesting user owns the target application.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache InLong 1.7.0 or apply the cherry-pick fix from GitHub PR #7799 to enforce proper authorization checks on application cancellation operations.
1.7.0
- Upgrade Apache InLong from version 1.2.0-1.6.0 to version 1.7.0 or later
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Fix this in Inlong
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31064 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31064 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data