CVE-2023-3107
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA set of carefully crafted ipv6 packets can trigger an integer overflow in the calculation of a fragment reassembled packet's payload length field. This allows an attacker to trigger a kernel panic, resulting in a denial of service.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceInteger overflow vulnerability in the IPv6 fragment reassembly code path. When processing a crafted sequence of IPv6 fragments, the kernel's calculation of the total reassembled packet's payload length can overflow, resulting in an incorrect length value that triggers a kernel panic and denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 12.4= 13.1= 13.2= 9.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify operating system and versionRun `uname -a` on FreeBSD or check system version via NetApp CLI with `version` commandAffected if The installed version matches FreeBSD 12.4, 13.1, 13.2 or NetApp Clustered Data Ontap 9.0 (or falls within these release branches)
-
Confirm IPv6 is enabledOn FreeBSD, run `sysctl net.inet6.ip6.accept_rtadv` or check `/etc/rc.conf` for `ipv6_enable="YES"`. On NetApp, check if IPv6 is configured via CLIAffected if IPv6 is enabled and the system processes IPv6 traffic
-
Verify IPv6 fragment reassembly is activeOn FreeBSD, check `sysctl net.inet6.ip6.frag` tunable values or run `netstat -s -p ip6` to see fragment activity. On NetApp, check if the system handles IPv6 fragmentsAffected if The system is configured to reassemble IPv6 fragments (default behavior)
-
Compare installed kernel to affected versionsOn FreeBSD, run `freebsd-version -u` to get the base version, or check `/usr/src/sys/conf/NEW_VERSION` if sources are installed. For NetApp, run `system node image` show to see all installed versionsAffected if The running kernel version matches the unpatched affected versions listed in the CVE
The system is affected if it runs an unpatched FreeBSD 12.4, 13.1, or 13.2 kernel, or NetApp Clustered Data Ontap 9.0, with IPv6 enabled and fragment reassembly processing enabled.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-supplied kernel patch for CVE-2023-3107. As a defensive measure, consider filtering or rate-limiting fragmented IPv6 traffic at network perimeter until patches are deployed.
FreeBSD 13.3 or 14.0; NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 9.x (patched)
- Check current FreeBSD version with: uname -a
- For FreeBSD 12.4, 13.1, or 13.2: upgrade to a newer stable release (13.3 or 14.0) that contains the fix for CVE-2023-3107
- For NetApp Clustered Data ONTAP 9.0: apply the corresponding patch from security.netapp.com (refer to NetApp advisory for specific patch number)
- After applying updates, reboot the system to load the patched kernel
- Verify the fix is applied by checking system logs for any related kernel updates and confirming system stability with test IPv6 traffic
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3107 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3107 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data