CVE-2023-31100
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper Access Control in SMI handler vulnerability in Phoenix SecureCore™ Technology™ 4 allows SPI flash modification. This issue affects SecureCore™ Technology™ 4: * from 4.3.0.0 before 4.3.0.203 * from 4.3.1.0 before 4.3.1.163 * from 4.4.0.0 before 4.4.0.217 * from 4.5.0.0 before 4.5.0.138
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceImproper access control in the System Management Interrupt (SMI) handler of Phoenix SecureCore Technology 4 UEFI firmware allows modification of SPI flash memory. The SMI handler runs at the highest privilege level (SMM), so this vulnerability could allow an attacker with privileged code execution to persist malicious firmware modifications.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 4.3.0.0, < 4.3.0.203>= 4.3.1.0, < 4.3.1.163>= 4.4.0.0, < 4.4.0.217>= 4.5.0.0, < 4.5.0.138CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Phoenix SecureCore Technology 4 firmware versionAccess the UEFI/BIOS setup screen during boot and locate the firmware version information, or use system information tools such as dmidecode -s bios-version on Linux, wmic bios get smbiosbiosversion on Windows, or vendor-specific diagnostic toolsAffected if The reported version falls within any of these ranges: >= 4.3.0.0 and < 4.3.0.203, >= 4.3.1.0 and < 4.3.1.163, >= 4.4.0.0 and < 4.4.0.217, or >= 4.5.0.0 and < 4.5.0.138
-
Confirm the firmware vendor is PhoenixtechVerify through the same BIOS/firmware information that the vendor is Phoenixtech and the product is specifically SecureCore Technology 4Affected if The firmware is from Phoenixtech SecureCore Technology 4 but the version is lower than the fixed releases (4.3.0.203, 4.3.1.163, 4.4.0.217, or 4.5.0.138 depending on the branch)
-
Check if SMM is enabled and accessibleReview UEFI/BIOS settings for System Management Mode configuration; on affected systems, the SMI handler with improper access controls is active by default when SMM is operationalAffected if SMM is active and the firmware version is within the vulnerable version ranges listed above
You are affected if your Phoenix SecureCore Technology 4 firmware version is lower than 4.3.0.203, 4.3.1.163, 4.4.0.217, or 4.5.0.138 depending on your version branch.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped4.3.0.2034.3.1.1634.4.0.217
Update Phoenix SecureCore Technology 4 to version 4.3.0.203, 4.3.1.163, 4.4.0.217, or 4.5.0.138 or later, depending on the current installed version branch.
Upgrade to SecureCore Technology 4.3.0.203, 4.3.1.163, 4.4.0.217, 4.5.0.138 or later respective to your current major version branch
- Obtain the firmware update from the official Phoenix Technologies support portal or your hardware vendor
- Verify the firmware image integrity using checksums provided by the vendor
- Follow the vendor-specific firmware update procedure, which typically involves: a) Backing up current configuration if supported, b) Initiating firmware update through vendor-provided tool or UEFI capsule update, c) Ensuring uninterrupted power during the update process, d) Verifying successful update by checking the new firmware version
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $12,352.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31100 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31100 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data