CVE-2023-31101
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInsecure Default Initialization of Resource Vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong.This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.5.0 through 1.6.0. Users registered in InLong who joined later can see deleted users' data. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.7.0 or cherry-pick https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7836 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7836 to solve it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an insecure default initialization vulnerability in Apache InLong (versions 1.5.0-1.6.0) where improper resource initialization allows newly registered users to access data belonging to deleted users. The vulnerability stems from inadequate isolation between user accounts during the user registration and data lifecycle management processes.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.5.0= 1.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Apache InLong versionCheck the InLong version file or API endpoint that reports the product version, such as checking the build artifacts, configuration files, or the /api/inlong/manager/api/version endpoint if availableAffected if The installed version is 1.5.0 or 1.6.0, as these are the affected versions listed in the CVE
-
Verify if user registration functionality existsCheck if the user registration endpoint or interface is accessible and functional in the InLong deploymentAffected if User registration is enabled and operational, allowing new users to be created in the system
-
Check for presence of deleted user dataReview system logs, audit records, or database entries for evidence of previously deleted users who may have left behind data resources (such as streams, groups, or pipelines)Affected if There are records of deleted users whose data resources still exist in the system after deletion
-
Test user data isolationRegister a new test user and attempt to access resources that belonged to a deleted user, if such deleted user data exists in the systemAffected if The new user can access, list, or modify data resources that were created by or assigned to a previously deleted user, indicating improper isolation
You are affected if you are running Apache InLong version 1.5.0 or 1.6.0 and your system has deleted users whose data resources may be accessible to newly registered users due to improper resource initialization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache InLong 1.7.0 or apply the cherry-pick from GitHub PR #7836 to fix the improper resource initialization that causes data exposure of deleted users to new users.
1.7.0
- Back up your current InLong installation and database before starting the upgrade process
- Stop all running InLong services to prevent data inconsistency during upgrade
- Upgrade Apache InLong to version 1.7.0 by following the official upgrade documentation for your deployment method
- Start the InLong services after the upgrade is complete
- Verify that the upgrade was successful by logging in and confirming that new users can no longer see deleted users' data
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31101 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31101 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data