CVE-2023-31103
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere Vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong.This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.4.0 through 1.6.0. Attackers can change the immutable name and type of cluster of InLong. Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.7.0 or cherry-pick https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7891 https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/7891 to solve it.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThis is an authorization bypass vulnerability where authenticated attackers can modify the immutable name and type properties of InLong clusters. The issue stems from insufficient access control checks on cluster configuration endpoints, allowing users to alter cluster attributes that should be read-only after creation.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.4.0, <= 1.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify InLong installation versionLocate the InLong version file or check the pom.xml, MANIFEST.MF, or version.properties in the deployed InLong installation directory. Alternatively, check the InLong dashboard footer or admin interface for the version number.Affected if The installed version is between 1.4.0 and 1.6.0 inclusive.
-
Verify cluster management API is accessibleConfirm the InLong manager service API endpoint is reachable. Check if the /api/inlong/manager/cluster or similar cluster management REST endpoints are exposed and accessible to authenticated users.Affected if The cluster management API is exposed and responds to authenticated requests.
-
Check if multi-user authentication is enforcedReview the InLong authentication configuration files (application.yml or manager.conf) to determine if proper access control and multi-user authentication are enabled for cluster operations.Affected if Multi-user or role-based access control is not properly configured, allowing any authenticated user to modify cluster properties.
-
Inspect cluster modification audit logsReview InLong audit or audit logs for any POST/PUT requests to cluster modification endpoints that altered the name or type fields of existing clusters after their initial creation.Affected if There are records of cluster name or type modifications occurring after cluster creation, indicating the vulnerability may have been exploited.
A user is affected if Apache InLong version 1.4.0 through 1.6.0 is installed and the cluster management interface is accessible to authenticated users without proper authorization checks on immutable cluster properties.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache InLong 1.7.0 or apply the cherry-pick from GitHub PR #7891 to implement proper authorization checks on cluster management operations.
1.7.0
- Plan for downtime and backup your InLong data and configuration
- Stop all InLong services
- Upgrade InLong to version 1.7.0 following the standard upgrade process
- Start InLong services and verify cluster functionality
- Confirm the vulnerability is resolved by verifying that non-admin users cannot modify cluster name and type
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA6.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,776.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31103 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31103 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data