CVE-2023-31148
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn Improper Input Validation vulnerability in the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories Real-Time Automation Controller (SEL RTAC) Web Interface could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code. See SEL Service Bulletin dated 2022-11-15 for more details.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper input validation in the SEL RTAC web interface allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject and execute arbitrary code. This is a classic web application vulnerability where user-supplied input is not properly sanitized before being processed, enabling code execution on the underlying system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r148-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r132-v0, < r150-v2>= r134-v0, < r150-v2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the SEL device modelLocate the physical device label or check the device documentation, web interface, or management console to determine if the hardware is one of: SEL 2241, SEL 3350, SEL 3505, SEL 3505 3, SEL 3530, SEL 3530 4, SEL 3532, or SEL 3555Affected if The device model matches one of the eight affected models listed in the CVE
-
Check the installed firmware versionAccess the device web interface, command line interface, or management software and locate the firmware version information. Compare the version string (e.g., r132-v0, r150-v2) against the affected ranges: r132-v0 to r150-v1 (or r148-v0 to r150-v1 for SEL 3350, r134-v0 to r150-v1 for SEL 3555)Affected if The firmware version falls within the affected range (>= r132-v0 or r134-v0/r148-v0 depending on model, but < r150-v2)
-
Verify the RTAC web interface is enabledCheck the device network configuration or web server settings to confirm the RTAC web interface is currently active and accessibleAffected if The RTAC web interface is enabled and accessible on the network
-
Confirm authentication is configured for the web interfaceCheck the web interface user accounts or authentication settings to determine if login is required to access administrative functionsAffected if User authentication is configured (since the vulnerability requires an authenticated attacker)
The environment is affected if the device is one of the eight listed models, runs firmware version r132-v0 through r150-v1 (or r134-v0/r148-v0 to r150-v1 for specific models), and has the RTAC web interface enabled with configured users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor patches from SEL Service Bulletin (2022-11-15) when available. Until patched, restrict network access to the RTAC web interface to trusted IPs only, minimize the number of authenticated users, and monitor for unusual administrative activity.
Upgrade to SEL RTAC firmware r150-v2 or later
- 1. Identify the specific SEL RTAC device model (e.g., SEL 3505, SEL 3530, etc.) currently in use
- 2. Check the current firmware version installed on the device through the web interface or CLI
- 3. Download the r150-v2 or later firmware version from the Schweitzer Engineering Laboratories (SEL) customer portal at selinc.com
- 4. Review the SEL Service Bulletin (dated 2022-11-15) for any specific upgrade prerequisites or instructions
- 5. Backup the current device configuration before initiating the firmware upgrade
- 6. Upload and apply the r150-v2 firmware through the SEL RTAC web interface or using the acutest utility according to SEL documentation
- 7. After upgrade, verify the firmware version shows r150-v2 or later
- 8. Confirm the web interface is functional and the vulnerability is remediated
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation8.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31148 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31148 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data