Ix Workforce EngagementApplication · Avaya

CVE-2023-31186

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-30
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Avaya IX Workforce Engagement v15.2.7.1195 - User Enumeration - Observable Response Discrepancy

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Avaya IX Workforce Engagement version 15.2.7.1195 contains a user enumeration vulnerability where the application returns distinguishable responses when valid versus invalid usernames are submitted, allowing attackers to identify valid user accounts through the Observable Response Discrepancy pattern.

MitigationImplement consistent response handling for authentication-related endpoints regardless of username validity, and consider adding rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms to deter automated enumeration attempts.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Ix Workforce EngagementApplication
Affected:= 15.2.7.1195

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify the installed version of Avaya IX Workforce Engagement
    Locate the software version information through the application admin interface, system information page, or installed programs list. This is typically found under Help > About or in the system registry under the Avaya installation directory.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 15.2.7.1195 (the only affected version listed).
  2. Identify authentication endpoints
    Review web application traffic or consult documentation to locate login and password reset endpoints that accept usernames as input.
    Affected if The application has endpoints that accept username input for authentication purposes.
  3. Test response for a likely valid username
    Submit a username that is known or suspected to be valid (such as a common administrator account like admin, administrator, or a known employee account) to the login or password recovery endpoint and capture the HTTP response code and message.
    Affected if The response contains specific information that differs from invalid username responses (such as prompting for password vs stating the account does not exist).
  4. Test response for an invalid username
    Submit a clearly invalid username (such as a random string like 'xyznonexistent123') to the same endpoint and capture the HTTP response code and message.
    Affected if The response is measurably different from the valid username response (for example, explicitly stating the username does not exist versus prompting for password).
  5. Compare responses for discrepancy
    Compare both responses side by side noting differences in error messages, response codes, timing, or any other distinguishable characteristic that could reveal username validity.
    Affected if The application returns different messages, error codes, or behaviors that allow an attacker to determine whether a username exists in the system.

You are affected if the installed version is 15.2.7.1195 AND the authentication endpoint returns distinguishable responses between valid and invalid usernames, allowing an attacker to enumerate existing user accounts.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement consistent response handling for authentication-related endpoints regardless of username validity, and consider adding rate limiting or account lockout mechanisms to deter automated enumeration attempts.

Fix this in Ix Workforce Engagement Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31186 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31186 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data