CVE-2023-31235
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Roland Barker, xnau webdesign Participants Database plugin <= 2.4.9 versions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceCross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in the Participants Database plugin versions 2.4.9 and earlier allows attackers to trick authenticated users into performing unintended actions by sending malicious requests. The lack of proper CSRF token validation on state-changing operations enables attackers to craft forged requests that the victim's browser will automatically include with their session credentials.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 2.5.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the Participants Database plugin versionIn WordPress admin, go to Plugins > Installed Plugins > Participants Database and look at the Version number. Alternatively, check the plugin's main PHP file header for the Version constant.Affected if The installed version is 2.4.9 or earlier (versions below 2.5.0 are affected)
-
Inspect state-changing forms for CSRF token fieldsView the HTML source of any frontend or backend form that modifies data (e.g., record submission, settings changes, member updates). Look for input fields with names like 'nonce', 'token', 'csrftoken', or similar, or hidden fields containing security tokens.Affected if Forms lack CSRF token/nonce hidden input fields
-
Verify CSRF token validation in form handler codeExamine the PHP files that process form submissions (typically in the plugin's main class or form handler files). Search for nonce verification functions like 'wp_verify_nonce', 'verify_nonce', or custom token validation logic before processing POST requests.Affected if Form processing code does not validate CSRF tokens before executing state-changing operations
-
Check cookie SameSite attributesUse browser developer tools (Application > Cookies) or a network proxy to inspect cookies set by the Participants Database plugin. Check if the SameSite attribute is set to 'Strict' or 'Lax', or verify cookie headers in HTTP responses.Affected if Cookies used for authentication/sessions lack SameSite attributes or have them set to 'None' without Secure flag
You are affected if the Participants Database plugin version is below 2.5.0 AND state-changing forms lack CSRF token validation or cookies lack appropriate SameSite attributes.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped2.5.0
Implement anti-CSRF tokens (synchronizer token pattern) for all state-changing operations and validate the Origin/Referer headers on POST requests. Alternatively, use SameSite cookie attributes to prevent cross-origin request submission.
Participants Database version 2.5.0
- Backup your WordPress site before making any changes
- Navigate to Plugins > Installed Plugins in your WordPress admin dashboard
- Locate the Participants Database plugin
- Click Update Now to install version 2.5.0 or later
- Verify the plugin version after update to confirm 2.5.0+ is installed
- Test that plugin functionality works as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,168.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31235 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31235 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data