Cash Point \& Transport OptimizerApplication · Sesami

CVE-2023-31296

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-12-29
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
CSV Injection vulnerability in Sesami Cash Point & Transport Optimizer (CPTO) version 6.3.8.6 (#718), allows attackers to obtain sensitive information via the User Name field.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

CSV Injection vulnerability in Sesami Cash Point & Transport Optimizer allows attackers to inject malicious spreadsheet formulas (prefixed with =, +, -, @) into the User Name field. When administrators export user data to CSV and open it in spreadsheet software, these formulas can execute to exfiltrate sensitive information from the system.

MitigationImplement input validation on the User Name field to strip or escape formula-special characters (=, +, -, @) and/or prefix all exported data with a single quote to neutralize formula execution in spreadsheet applications.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Cash Point \& Transport OptimizerApplication
Affected:= 6.3.8.6.718

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed version of Sesami Cash Point & Transport Optimizer
    Locate the application version information in the software's about dialog, system information panel, or installation directory metadata. Compare it to the affected version 6.3.8.6.718.
    Affected if The installed version matches 6.3.8.6.718 exactly.
  2. Verify access to the User Name field in user management
    Navigate to the user creation or user profile management interface within the application and locate the User Name input field.
    Affected if The User Name field is accessible and accepts input without sanitization of special characters.
  3. Confirm CSV export functionality exists
    Look for an export or data export feature in the administrative or user management section of the application that supports exporting user data to CSV format.
    Affected if A CSV export feature for user data is present and available to administrators.
  4. Check for existing users with formula characters in names
    Query or list all existing user accounts and examine the User Name field for the presence of characters =, +, -, or @ at the beginning of the username.
    Affected if Any user account has a User Name starting with =, +, -, or @ characters.

You are affected if you are running version 6.3.8.6.718, have access to the User Name field, and possess a CSV export feature for user data, regardless of whether malicious usernames currently exist.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement input validation on the User Name field to strip or escape formula-special characters (=, +, -, @) and/or prefix all exported data with a single quote to neutralize formula execution in spreadsheet applications.

Fix this in Cash Point \& Transport Optimizer Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,750
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31296 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31296 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data