CVE-2023-31351
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedImproper restriction of operations in the IOMMU could allow a malicious hypervisor to access guest private memory resulting in loss of integrity.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceImproper restriction of operations in the IOMMU (Input-Output Memory Management Unit) allows a malicious hypervisor to bypass isolation boundaries and access guest private memory, resulting in loss of integrity. This is a vulnerability in how the IOMMU enforces memory access controls between the hypervisor and virtual machines.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- High
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify if IOMMU is enabled in the systemOn Linux, run 'dmesg | grep -i iommu' or check /proc/cmdline for iommu= parameters. On Windows, check BIOS/UEFI settings or use 'msinfo32' to look for IOMMU information.Affected if IOMMU is present and enabled in the system firmware and operating system
-
Identify the hypervisor type and versionRun commands such as 'systemd-machined' (for KVM), 'vmware -v' (for VMware), 'Get-VMHost' in PowerShell (for Hyper-V), or 'xl version' (for Xen). Check installed hypervisor packages and their versions.Affected if A hypervisor is running and its version cannot be confirmed as patched for CVE-2023-31351
-
Check IOMMU passthrough or-grouper configurationFor KVM/Xen, inspect VM configuration XML files for '<iommu>' settings. For KVM, check /etc/modprobe.d/ for iommu settings. For VMware, check VM configuration files for 'iommu.enabled' settings.Affected if IOMMU passthrough mode is enabled without confirmed vendor patches applied
-
Verify hypervisor kernel or firmware versionCheck the hypervisor kernel version (uname -a for Linux hypervisors) or firmware/ESXi version. Compare against any available vendor security advisories for CVE-2023-31351.Affected if The running hypervisor kernel or firmware version predates the patch date for this CVE and IOMMU is active
A system is affected if it runs a hypervisor with IOMMU enabled and the hypervisor version is older than the vendor patch release date for CVE-2023-31351, or the patch status cannot be verified.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor-provided patches or firmware updates that correct the IOMMU operation restrictions; verify hypervisor configurations enforce proper IOMMU isolation between VMs.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,616.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31351 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31351 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data