CVE-2023-31418
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue has been identified with how Elasticsearch handled incoming requests on the HTTP layer. An unauthenticated user could force an Elasticsearch node to exit with an OutOfMemory error by sending a moderate number of malformed HTTP requests. The issue was identified by Elastic Engineering and we have no indication that the issue is known or that it is being exploited in the wild.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceElasticsearch versions prior to the fix contained a vulnerability in its HTTP layer where malformed HTTP requests could trigger excessive memory consumption, causing the node to crash with an OutOfMemory error. An unauthenticated attacker can remotely exploit this by sending a moderate number of crafted requests, leading to denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 7.17.12>= 8.0.0, <= 8.8.2<= 2.13.3= 3.6.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the Elasticsearch product variantRun 'elasticsearch --version' or check the installed package name. For Elastic Cloud Enterprise, check the ECE version via the admin console or 'ece version' command.Affected if The product is Elasticsearch or Elastic Cloud Enterprise and the HTTP interface is accessible
-
Determine the installed Elasticsearch versionRun 'curl -s http://localhost:9200/' to query the cluster info, or check the version from the elasticsearch binary with 'elasticsearch --version', or examine the installed package version via system package manager.Affected if The version is <= 7.17.12 OR (>= 8.0.0 AND <= 8.8.2)
-
Determine the installed Elastic Cloud Enterprise versionCheck the ECE version through the administration console or by running 'ece version' if CLI is available.Affected if The version is <= 2.13.3 OR version equals 3.6.0
-
Verify HTTP interface exposureCheck network configuration to determine if the Elasticsearch HTTP port (default 9200) or proxy ports are exposed to untrusted networks. Review load balancer, firewall, or cloud security group rules.Affected if The HTTP interface is reachable from untrusted network segments (public internet or unauthorized internal networks)
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable Elasticsearch or Elastic Cloud Enterprise version AND have the HTTP interface exposed to untrusted users, allowing unauthenticated attackers to send malformed HTTP requests.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade Elasticsearch to the version containing the vendor patch. If immediate patching is not possible, consider network-level filtering to limit exposure of the HTTP interface to untrusted users.
Elasticsearch 7.17.13+/8.9.0+ or Elastic Cloud Enterprise 2.13.4+/3.6.1+
- Backup your Elasticsearch cluster data and configuration before upgrading
- Test the upgrade in a non-production environment first
- For Elasticsearch: Upgrade to version 7.17.13 or later, or 8.9.0 or later
- For Elastic Cloud Enterprise: Upgrade to version 2.13.4 or later, or 3.6.1 or later
- Verify the upgrade was successful and the service is running properly
- Monitor system resources to confirm the OOM vulnerability is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31418 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31418 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data