Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)Weakness · CWE-918

CVE-2023-31456

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-16
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
There is an SSRF vulnerability in the Fluid Topics platform that affects versions prior to 4.3, where the server can be forced to make arbitrary requests to internal and external resources by an authenticated user.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the Fluid Topics platform affecting versions prior to 4.3. An authenticated user can exploit this flaw to force the server to make arbitrary HTTP requests to both internal infrastructure and external resources, potentially leading to internal service enumeration, cloud metadata exposure, or firewall bypass.

MitigationUpgrade Fluid Topics to version 4.3 or later. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, implement strict network segmentation and restrict server-side outgoing network connections to prevent abuse of this SSRF vector.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if Fluid Topics is installed
    Look for Fluid Topics installation directories or check running services on the host. Common locations may include /opt/fluidtopics, /usr/local/fluidtopics, or check for the fluidtopics service/process.
    Affected if Fluid Topics software is present on the system
  2. Determine the installed Fluid Topics version
    Check the version file or command output. Common methods include: looking for a VERSION file in the installation directory, running 'fluidtopics --version' if available, or checking the admin interface for version information.
    Affected if The installed version is lower than 4.3 (e.g., 4.2.x, 4.1.x, earlier versions)
  3. Verify if user authentication is enabled and active
    Check the Fluid Topics authentication configuration files (such as security or authentication settings in the config directory). Determine if local authentication, LDAP, or other user management is configured and active.
    Affected if User authentication is configured and users can log in to the Fluid Topics platform
  4. Identify if external HTTP request features are accessible
    Review Fluid Topics configuration for features that allow users to specify URLs or make server-side HTTP requests. This may include data connectors, content sources, or custom feed configurations.
    Affected if Features allowing URL input or HTTP requests from the server are accessible to authenticated users

You are affected if Fluid Topics is installed with a version prior to 4.3 and authenticated users can access features that trigger server-side HTTP requests.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Upgrade Fluid Topics to version 4.3 or later. If immediate upgrading is not feasible, implement strict network segmentation and restrict server-side outgoing network connections to prevent abuse of this SSRF vector.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

4.3 or later

  1. Upgrade Fluid Topics platform to version 4.3 or later to remediate the SSRF vulnerability
  2. Verify the upgrade in a test environment before deploying to production
  3. After upgrading, confirm that authenticated users can no longer force the server to make arbitrary requests to internal/external resources

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31456 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31456 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data