CVE-2023-31889
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn issue discovered in httpd in ASUS RT-AC51U with firmware version up to and including 3.0.0.4.380.8591 allows local attackers to cause a denial of service via crafted GET request.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA denial of service vulnerability exists in the httpd service of ASUS RT-AC51U routers running firmware version 3.0.0.4.380.8591 and earlier. A local attacker can send a specially crafted GET request to trigger the DoS condition.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm router model is RT-AC51ULog into the router web interface (typically 192.168.1.1) or check the device label/marketing box to verify the exact model number matches RT-AC51UAffected if The router is not an ASUS RT-AC51U model, then this specific CVE does not apply
-
Check installed firmware versionAccess the router web admin interface, navigate to Administration or System status section, and locate the firmware version displayed. Compare it to 3.0.0.4.380.8591 - any version equal to or lower than this is affectedAffected if Firmware version is 3.0.0.4.380.8591 or earlier
-
Verify httpd service is runningAccess the router via telnet or SSH if enabled, and run a command to list running processes (such as 'ps' or similar) to confirm the httpd service is activeAffected if The httpd process is not running, the vulnerability cannot be triggered even on affected firmware
-
Check network accessibility of httpd serviceFrom a local host on the same network, attempt to access the router's web interface on the standard HTTP port 80 or HTTPS port 443 to confirm the service is reachable over the networkAffected if The httpd service is accessible from the local network, an attacker on the same network could send the crafted GET request
You are affected if you own an ASUS RT-AC51U router running firmware version 3.0.0.4.380.8591 or earlier, with the httpd service running and accessible from your local network.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the latest ASUS firmware update for the RT-AC51U when available, or implement network access controls to restrict local access to the httpd service.
- Consultation1.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,200.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-31889 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-31889 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data