S4coreApplication · Sap

CVE-2023-32112

MEDIUM · 5.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
57/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Vendor Master Hierarchy - versions SAP_APPL 500, SAP_APPL 600, SAP_APPL 602, SAP_APPL 603, SAP_APPL 604, SAP_APPL 605, SAP_APPL 606, SAP_APPL 616, SAP_APPL 617, SAP_APPL 618, S4CORE 100, does not perform necessary authorization checks for an authenticated user to access some of its function. This could lead to modification of data impacting the integrity of the system.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SAP Vendor Master Hierarchy (components SAP_APPL and S4CORE) lacks proper authorization checks, allowing authenticated users to modify vendor data through functions they should not have access to. This is an Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) or broken access control vulnerability in the vendor master hierarchy module.

MitigationApply the relevant SAP Security Note to enforce proper authorization checks in the Vendor Master Hierarchy component. Review and restrict user authorizations to conform to the principle of least privilege.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
S4coreApplication
Affected:= 100
Vendor Master HierarchyApplication
Affected:= sap_appl_500= sap_appl_600= sap_appl_602= sap_appl_603= sap_appl_604= sap_appl_605= sap_appl_606= sap_appl_616= sap_appl_617= sap_appl_618

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check SAP_APPL component version
    Execute transaction code SPAM or SAINT, navigate to Support Package Manager, and locate the SAP_APPL component version installed (typically shown as sap_appl_xxx where xxx is the version number such as 500, 600, 602, etc.)
    Affected if The installed SAP_APPL version matches any of these: 500, 600, 602, 603, 604, 605, 606, 616, 617, or 618
  2. Check S4CORE component version
    Execute transaction SPAM or SAINT and locate the S4CORE component version. This is typically found in the component overview showing S4CORE with version 100 or as part of S/4HANA core components
    Affected if The installed S4CORE version is 100
  3. Determine if Vendor Master Hierarchy module is active
    Execute transaction code MKVP (Vendor Master Hierarchy) or XK02/XK03 (Change/Display Vendor Master) to access the vendor master hierarchy functions. Check if the hierarchy functionality is configured and accessible in the system
    Affected if The Vendor Master Hierarchy transaction (MKVP or related) is accessible and the hierarchy function is active in the SAP system
  4. Identify users with vendor master modification access
    Execute transaction code SUIM (User Information System), go to Roles, and search for roles containing authorization objects M_EINK_KO (Purchasing Organization - Vendor) or M_EKKO (Purchasing Document). Also check transaction code SU53 after users attempt modifications to see which authorizations were checked
    Affected if Multiple users have vendor master modification authorizations assigned beyond the expected purchasing team members, indicating overly broad access

The environment is affected if the installed SAP_APPL version matches any of the listed vulnerable versions (500, 600, 602-606, 616-618) or S4CORE version 100 is present, AND the Vendor Master Hierarchy functionality is active in the system.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply the relevant SAP Security Note to enforce proper authorization checks in the Vendor Master Hierarchy component. Review and restrict user authorizations to conform to the principle of least privilege.

Fix this in S4core Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
22.0 hours of engineering $3,860
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32112 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32112 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data