CVE-2023-32307
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedSofia-SIP is an open-source SIP User-Agent library, compliant with the IETF RFC3261 specification. Referring to [GHSA-8599-x7rq-fr54](https://github.com/freeswitch/sofia-sip/security/advisories/GHSA-8599-x7rq-fr54), several other potential heap-over-flow and integer-overflow in stun_parse_attr_error_code and stun_parse_attr_uint32 were found because the lack of attributes length check when Sofia-SIP handles STUN packets. The previous patch of [GHSA-8599-x7rq-fr54](https://github.com/freeswitch/sofia-sip/security/advisories/GHSA-8599-x7rq-fr54) fixed the vulnerability when attr_type did not match the enum value, but there are also vulnerabilities in the handling of other valid cases. The OOB read and integer-overflow made by attacker may lead to crash, high consumption of memory or even other more serious consequences. These issue have been addressed in version 1.13.15. Users are advised to upgrade.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceSofia-SIP library contains heap overflow and integer overflow vulnerabilities in STUN packet parsing functions stun_parse_attr_error_code and stun_parse_attr_uint32 due to missing attributes length validation. Attackers can craft malicious STUN packets with insufficient length checks, causing out-of-bounds reads, memory corruption, crashes, or excessive memory consumption.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 10.0< 1.13.15CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Sofia-SIP installationSearch for Sofia-SIP libraries in common locations: /usr/lib/libsofia-sip-ua.so*, /usr/lib64/libsofia-sip-ua.so*, or use package manager commands like 'dpkg -l | grep sofia-sip' (Debian) or 'rpm -qa | grep sofia-sip' (RHEL-based). Also check for linked binaries using 'ldconfig -p | grep sofia' or 'find /usr -name "*sofia*"'Affected if Sofia-SIP library is present on the system
-
Determine installed Sofia-SIP versionIf using Debian: run 'dpkg -l libsofia-sip-ua0' to get the version. If a binary is found: run 'strings <path_to_lib> | grep -i "sofia.*sip"' or check the shared library filename which may contain the version. Compare against the affected range: versions before 1.13.15 are vulnerableAffected if Installed version is before 1.13.15 or version cannot be determined
-
Verify STUN protocol processing is enabledSearch configuration files and application logs for STUN configuration: look for 'stun' keyword in config files (e.g., /etc/, /opt/, application config directories), check running processes for STUN-related parameters using 'ps aux | grep -i stun', and review network service configurations for port 3478 (STUN default port)Affected if STUN processing is actively enabled or configured in any application using Sofia-SIP
-
Inspect STUN packet handling code pathsIf source code is available: search for calls to 'stun_parse_attr_error_code' and 'stun_parse_attr_uint32' functions. If binary only: use 'nm -D <libsofia> | grep stun_parse_attr' or 'objdump -T <libsofia> | grep stun_parse_attr' to confirm these functions are exported and linkedAffected if The vulnerable parsing functions stun_parse_attr_error_code or stun_parse_attr_uint32 are present and used
A system is affected if Sofia-SIP version below 1.13.15 is installed AND STUN protocol processing is enabled, as the vulnerability requires both the unpatched library and active STUN packet handling to be exploitable.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.13.15
Upgrade Sofia-SIP to version 1.13.15 or later to obtain the patched code with proper attribute length validation. If upgrade is not immediately feasible, implement input validation filters for STUN packets at network boundaries.
1.13.15
- Update the package repository: apt-get update
- Upgrade Sofia-SIP library to version 1.13.15 or later: apt-get install libsofia-sip-ua0 (or apt-get upgrade libsofia-sip-ua0)
- Verify the installed version matches 1.13.15 or higher: dpkg -l | grep sofia-sip
- If using Sofia-SIP in any running services, restart them to load the updated library
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $7,040.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32307 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32307 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data