CVE-2023-32607
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedStored cross-site scripting vulnerability in Pleasanter (Community Edition and Enterprise Edition) 1.3.39.2 and earlier versions allows a remote authenticated attacker to inject an arbitrary script.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidencePleasanter versions 1.3.39.2 and earlier contain a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability where a remote authenticated attacker can inject arbitrary JavaScript into application fields that are later rendered to other users without proper sanitization.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.3.39.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Pleasanter versionAccess the application admin panel, check the version displayed in the About or System Information page, or inspect the installation directory for version metadata filesAffected if The displayed version is 1.3.39.2 or any version number lower than 1.3.39.2
-
Verify authentication is enabledCheck the system configuration or login page to confirm user authentication is active; the vulnerability requires an authenticated attackerAffected if Authentication is enabled and users can log in to the application
-
Review user-created records for unsanitized contentQuery the database tables that store user-submitted data (typically items, comments, or custom fields tables) and inspect field contents for unencoded HTML or script tags that may represent injected payloadsAffected if Database contains user input with raw HTML or script tags that render as executable code in the browser
-
Test field rendering behaviorCreate a test record with a script tag in a text field (e.g., <script>alert(1)</script>), then view that record as a different user account to see if the script executesAffected if The script tag renders as-is and executes when viewed by another user, indicating lack of output encoding
-
Check for recent unauthorized accessReview application audit logs, access logs, or user activity logs for any suspicious activity from authenticated users that may have injected malicious contentAffected if Logs show unexpected or anomalous record creation or editing activity from user accounts
The environment is affected if Pleasanter version 1.3.39.2 or earlier is installed and the application allows authenticated users to create or edit content in fields that are displayed to other users without output encoding.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.3.39.2
Upgrade to a version newer than 1.3.39.2; implement output encoding and input validation on all user-supplied fields to prevent script execution.
Pleasanter 1.3.39.2 or later
- 1. Back up the current Pleasanter database and configuration files before performing any upgrade
- 2. Download the latest stable release of Pleasanter from the official repository or the vendor's website
- 3. Follow the standard Pleasanter upgrade procedure documented in the official installation guide
- 4. Verify that the upgrade completed successfully by logging into the application
- 5. Test that the vulnerability is no longer present by attempting to inject script content in input fields that were previously vulnerable
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,480.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32607 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32607 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data