CVE-2023-32632
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedA command execution vulnerability exists in the validate.so diag_ping_start functionality of Yifan YF325 v1.0_20221108. A specially crafted network request can lead to command execution. An attacker can send a network request to trigger this vulnerability.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA command execution vulnerability exists in the diag_ping_start function within the validate.so library of the Yifan YF325 router firmware v1.0_20221108. The vulnerability is remotely exploitable via specially crafted network requests, allowing attackers to execute arbitrary commands on the affected device.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 1.0_20221108CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the device modelCheck the router model number via web interface, label on device, or SSH command such as 'cat /proc/cpuinfo' or 'nvram get model_name'Affected if Device is not a Yifan YF325 router - not affected
-
Check the firmware versionAccess router web interface system info page, or via SSH run command like 'cat /etc/version' or 'nvram get firmware_version'Affected if Firmware version is NOT exactly 1.0_20221108 - not affected
-
Verify validate.so library presenceCheck if the vulnerable library exists by running 'ls -la /lib/validate.so' or searching via 'find / -name validate.so' over SSHAffected if File /lib/validate.so does not exist - likely not affected
-
Confirm diagnostic interface is accessibleCheck if the ping diagnostic endpoint is reachable - attempt to access the ping功能的 CGI interface or check if 'diag_ping_start' is an exported function in validate.so via 'nm -D /lib/validate.so | grep diag_ping'Affected if Diagnostic ping interface is disabled or not exposed externally - lower risk but still vulnerable if library is present
A user is affected if they have a Yifan YF325 router running firmware version 1.0_20221108 with the validate.so library present and the diagnostic ping interface exposed.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply vendor firmware updates when available; prior to patch, restrict network access to the device and disable unnecessary diagnostic interfaces.
- Consultation6.0 h
- Implementation12.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $8,448.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32632 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32632 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data