CVE-2023-32722
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe zabbix/src/libs/zbxjson module is vulnerable to a buffer overflow when parsing JSON files via zbx_json_open.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA buffer overflow vulnerability exists in Zabbix's zbxjson library module (zabbix/src/libs/zbxjson) when parsing JSON files through the zbx_json_open function. This memory corruption issue could allow an attacker to overwrite adjacent memory regions by supplying specially crafted JSON input, potentially leading to arbitrary code execution or denial of service.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.20>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.5= 7.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if Zabbix is installedRun 'zabbix_server --version' or 'zabbix_agentd --version' to identify the Zabbix components and version installed on the system.Affected if No output or Zabbix not found means the system is not affected by this specific vulnerability.
-
Verify the installed version against affected rangesCompare the installed Zabbix version number to the affected ranges: 6.0.0 through 6.0.20, 6.4.0 through 6.4.5, or 7.0.0 exactly. If the version falls within any of these ranges, the system is potentially affected.Affected if The installed version is 6.0.0-6.0.20, 6.4.0-6.4.5, or 7.0.0.
-
Identify JSON input sources processed by ZabbixReview Zabbix configuration files (typically zabbix_server.conf or zabbix_agentd.conf) and check for items, traps, or templates that process JSON data. Look for user parameters, external checks, or HTTP agent items that accept JSON input.Affected if Zabbix is configured to accept or process JSON data from external or user-defined sources.
-
Assess exposure of zbx_json_open functionExamine logs or network traffic for JSON-based communication such as Zabbix sender data, trapper items, or API calls that involve JSON parsing. Check if the Zabbix server or agent handles JSON from untrusted network sources.Affected if Zabbix processes JSON data from untrusted or external sources without additional validation.
A system is affected if Zabbix is installed with a version in the ranges 6.0.0-6.0.20, 6.4.0-6.4.5, or 7.0.0, and the system processes JSON input through the zbx_json_open function from any source.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpdate Zabbix to the latest version containing the security patch for this vulnerability. If immediate patching is not feasible, restrict or validate JSON file inputs and limit exposure of the zbx_json_open function to untrusted sources.
Zabbix 6.0.21+, 6.4.6+, or 7.0.1+ (depending on your major version branch)
- 1. Identify the currently installed Zabbix version using 'zabbix_server --version' or checking the package manager.
- 2. For Zabbix 6.0.x installations: upgrade to version 6.0.21 or later.
- 3. For Zabbix 6.4.x installations: upgrade to version 6.4.6 or later.
- 4. For Zabbix 7.0.x installations: upgrade to version 7.0.1 or later.
- 5. After upgrading, restart the Zabbix server service using 'systemctl restart zabbix-server' or the appropriate service manager command.
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Zabbix server version again and ensuring normal operation.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32722 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32722 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data