CVE-2023-32725
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe website configured in the URL widget will receive a session cookie when testing or executing scheduled reports. The received session cookie can then be used to access the frontend as the particular user.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThe URL widget in the affected application leaks session cookies to configured external websites when users test or execute scheduled reports. An attacker who controls or monitors the target URL can capture these session cookies and use them to authenticate to the application frontend as the victim user, achieving session hijacking.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.21>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.6= 7.0.0>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.21>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.6= 7.0.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Zabbix Server versionAccess the Zabbix UI, navigate to Administration > System Information, and note the Server version. Alternatively, use the Zabbix API endpoint apiinfo.version or check the server version file in the Zabbix installation directory.Affected if The installed version falls within 6.0.0-6.0.21, 6.4.0-6.4.6, or equals 7.0.0
-
Check Zabbix Frontend versionAccess the Zabbix UI, navigate to Administration > System Information, and note the Frontend version. Alternatively, check the frontend version file in the web server directory where Zabbix is installed.Affected if The installed version falls within 6.0.0-6.0.21, 6.4.0-6.4.6, or equals 7.0.0 and differs from the server version
-
Identify URL widgets in dashboardsIn the Zabbix UI, navigate to Monitoring > Dashboards and review each dashboard for URL widgets. Click on each URL widget to inspect its configured URL target.Affected if Any URL widget is configured pointing to an external or untrusted domain outside your organization
-
Check scheduled reports for URL actionsNavigate to Reports > Scheduled reports and review each report configuration to see if any include URL widget actions or links to external URLs.Affected if Any scheduled report is configured to access external URLs that could receive session cookies during execution
Your environment is affected if you run any Zabbix Server or Frontend version within the affected ranges AND have URL widgets configured pointing to external domains or scheduled reports that trigger external URL access.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedRestrict the URL widget to internal/trusted domains only, implement SameSite=Strict or SameSite=Lax attributes on session cookies, or disable cookie transmission to external URLs entirely.
Zabbix 6.0.22+, 6.4.7+, or 7.0.1+ (Server and Frontend)
- 1. Identify which Zabbix Server and Frontend versions are currently deployed in your environment.
- 2. For Zabbix 6.0.x deployments: Upgrade to Zabbix Server 6.0.22 or later, and ensure Frontend is also upgraded to 6.0.22 or later.
- 3. For Zabbix 6.4.x deployments: Upgrade to Zabbix Server 6.4.7 or later, and ensure Frontend is also upgraded to 6.4.7 or later.
- 4. For Zabbix 7.0.0 deployments: Upgrade to Zabbix Server 7.0.1 or later, and ensure Frontend is also upgraded to 7.0.1 or later.
- 5. After upgrading, verify the Zabbix services are running correctly and the frontend is accessible.
- 6. Test the URL widget functionality to confirm the fix is working as expected.
- 7. Review user session handling and consider rotating sessions if any suspicious activity was observed.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32725 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32725 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data