CVE-2023-32798
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedMissing Authorization vulnerability in 10up Simple Page Ordering allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Simple Page Ordering: from n/a through 2.5.0.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceMissing authorization vulnerability in the Simple Page Ordering WordPress plugin allows authenticated users to exploit incorrectly configured access control security levels, potentially enabling unauthorized reordering of pages beyond their intended permissions.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify Simple Page Ordering plugin is installedNavigate to WordPress Admin > Plugins and locate 'Simple Page Ordering' in the installed plugins list. Note the version number displayed next to the plugin name.Affected if The plugin is installed and active, and the version shown is earlier than 2.5.0 or no version is displayed (indicating an older release)
-
Check the installed plugin version numberIn the Plugins list, click on the plugin and look for the version information in the details popup, or check the plugin header in wp-content/plugins/simple-page-ordering/simple-page-ordering.php for the 'Version' comment.Affected if The version is below 2.5.0 (for example, 2.4.3, 2.3.x, etc.)
-
Identify user accounts with page-editing capabilitiesGo to WordPress Admin > Users and review all user accounts. Check which users have the 'edit_pages' or 'edit_others_pages' capability assigned (either through their role or custom capability).Affected if There are user accounts with low-privilege roles (such as Subscriber or Contributor) who incorrectly have page-editing capabilities due to misconfiguration
-
Test unauthorized page reordering capabilityUsing a test low-privilege user account (e.g., Subscriber), attempt to access /wp-admin/admin-ajax.php?action=simple_page_ordering and reorder pages outside your authorized scope. Check if the request succeeds when it should fail based on role permissions.Affected if The reordering action completes successfully for a user who should not have permission to reorder pages based on their assigned role
A user is affected if the Simple Page Ordering plugin is installed with a version earlier than 2.5.0 AND low-privilege users can reorder pages they should not have access to.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate Simple Page Ordering to version 2.5.0 or later which contains the authorization fix. Alternatively, review and enforce proper user role-based access controls at the application level.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,800.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32798 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32798 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data