AndroidOperating system · Google

CVE-2023-32805

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-04
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
65/100
Remediation priority · Elevated

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In power, there is a possible out of bounds write due to an insecure default value. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08102892; Issue ID: ALPS08102892.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

This is an out-of-bounds write vulnerability in the power management subsystem of MediaTek ALPS (Android Linux Platform). The flaw stems from an insecure default value that allows writing beyond allocated buffer boundaries. A local attacker with System-level execution privileges could potentially escalate privileges, though user interaction is required for exploitation.

MitigationApply vendor patch ALPS08102892 which corrects the insecure default value in the power management component. This is a MediaTek platform vulnerability requiring a system firmware/software update.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
AndroidOperating system
Affected:= 11.0= 12.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check Android version
    Go to Settings > About Phone > Android version, or run 'getprop ro.build.version.release' via adb shell
    Affected if Version is exactly 11.0 or 12.0
  2. Verify MediaTek chipset
    Run 'getprop ro.hardware' or 'getprop ro.chipset' via adb shell, or check /proc/cpuinfo for MediaTek processor info
    Affected if Device uses a MediaTek SoC/processor
  3. Confirm power management subsystem is active
    Check for the presence of Mediatek power management kernel modules: look for files containing 'mtk_pmic' or similar in /vendor/lib/modules/ or check 'lsmod' output for power management related modules
    Affected if MediaTek power management kernel modules are loaded and active
  4. Identify vulnerable power management component
    Review /sys/kernel/debug/vcpu or /sys/power/ state files, or check /vendor/firmware/ for power management firmware files
    Affected if Power management component with MediaTek ALPS firmware is present
  5. Check system privileges
    Verify current process has System-level privileges using 'id' command or check process capabilities via 'cat /proc/<pid>/status'
    Affected if Exploitation requires System-level execution privileges, which are typically held by system_server and certain system services

You are affected only if your device runs Android version 11.0 or 12.0 on a MediaTek chipset with the vulnerable power management subsystem enabled, and an attacker with System-level privileges can trigger the out-of-bounds write via the insecure default buffer value.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor patch ALPS08102892 which corrects the insecure default value in the power management component. This is a MediaTek platform vulnerability requiring a system firmware/software update.

Fix this in Android Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing6.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,560
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32805 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32805 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data