CVE-2023-32818
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn vdec, there is a possible out of bounds write due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08163896 & ALPS08013430; Issue ID: ALPS07867715.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in the vdec (video decoder) component allows an attacker to write out of bounds, leading to local privilege escalation to System level. No user interaction is required for exploitation. The vulnerability stems from improper type handling during video decoding operations.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0= 12.0= 13.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Android versionRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' in a terminal or check Settings > About Phone > Android versionAffected if The version shows 11.0, 12.0, or 13.0 - these are the affected versions listed for this CVE
-
Confirm vdec component presenceCheck if the video decoder (vdec) module is present on the device. This can be done by examining /system/vendor/lib/libvdec.so or similar vdec-related libraries in /system/vendor or searching for 'vdec' in /proc/kallsyms if root access is availableAffected if The vdec component exists on the device - the vulnerability resides in this specific video decoder module
-
Check for vendor-specific vdecMediaTek-based devices often include vdec in /vendor or /system/vendor partitions. Run 'ls /vendor/lib*/*vdec*' or 'find /system/vendor -name *vdec*' to locate the componentAffected if vdec libraries or binaries are found - the type confusion flaw exists within this component on affected Android versions
-
Identify system privilege contextReview which processes or services run with System-level privileges and utilize video decoding. Check running services via 'dumpsys' or examine media.codec processesAffected if Video decoder processes run with System privileges - the vulnerability allows escalation to System level from the context where vdec executes
If the device runs Android 11.0, 12.0, or 13.0 AND contains the vdec video decoder component (common on MediaTek-based Android devices), the environment is vulnerable to local privilege escalation via the type confusion flaw in vdec.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patches (ALPS08163896 and ALPS08013430) to address the type confusion in vdec. Since this is a local privilege escalation with System privileges, prioritize patching systems with elevated risk exposure.
Android 14 or later system update with June 2023 Security Patch Level or higher that includes MediaTek fixes
- 1. Check the device manufacturer's Android security update level in Settings > About Phone > Software Info > Security Patch Level
- 2. Verify if the device has received the Android Security Bulletin patch that includes CVE-2023-32818 - typically the June 2023 or later Security Patch Level
- 3. If not patched, contact the device manufacturer (OEM) for the firmware update containing MediaTek patch ALPS08163896 and ALPS08013430
- 4. Apply the manufacturer-provided system update that includes the MediaTek vdec fix
- 5. Verify the security patch level has been updated to include the fix for this vulnerability
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32818 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32818 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data