CVE-2023-32848
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn vdec, there is a possible out of bounds write due to type confusion. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS08163896; Issue ID: ALPS08163896.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA type confusion vulnerability in the vdec (video decoder) component allows an attacker to trigger an out-of-bounds write. Since the vulnerable code runs with System privileges, successful exploitation enables local privilege escalation to System level without requiring user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 11.0= 12.0= 13.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm device uses MediaTek chipsetCheck /proc/cpuinfo or use 'getprop ro.hardware' or 'getprop ro.chipname' to identify the SoC vendor. This vulnerability is in the ALPS (MediaTek) video decoder component.Affected if Device does not use a MediaTek chipset - the vulnerability is specific to MediaTek's ALPS vdec component
-
Verify Android version is affectedRun 'getprop ro.build.version.release' to check the Android version. This vulnerability affects Android 11.0, 12.0, and 13.0 specifically.Affected if Android version is 11.0, 12.0, or 13.0 exactly - versions outside this range are not affected according to the advisory
-
Check patch levelRun 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' to see the installed security patch level. Compare against the date of the ALPS08163896 patch.Affected if Security patch level is older than the patch addressing ALPS08163896 - indicates vulnerability is unpatched
-
Identify vdec component presenceCheck for video decoder modules: look in /vendor/lib/ or /system/lib/ for files containing 'vdec' in the name, or check /proc/modules if the vdec module is loaded.Affected if vdec component is present and loaded - the vulnerability exists in this component
A user is affected if they have a MediaTek-based Android device (11.0, 12.0, or 13.0) that has not received the ALPS08163896 patch in its security update.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor patch ALPS08163896 to update the vdec component. As this is a MediaTek/ALPS video decoder vulnerability, this likely involves updating the device firmware or media framework packages.
Install the latest Android Security Patch Level containing MediaTek patch ALPS08163896 (May 2023 security update or later). Contact your device manufacturer for specific version availability.
- 1. Identify if your Android device uses a MediaTek chipset. This vulnerability affects MediaTek-based devices.
- 2. Contact your device manufacturer or carrier to confirm if they have released a security update containing the MediaTek patch (Patch ID: ALPS08163896).
- 3. Navigate to Settings > Security on your Android device.
- 4. Check for and install any available system updates.
- 5. Ensure your device has the latest Android Security Patch Level (SPL) installed. For this CVE, look for SPL dates that include the fix (typically May 2023 or later security patches).
- 6. If no update is available from your manufacturer, consider upgrading to a device model that receives regular security updates, or wait for your manufacturer to release the patch.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation4.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA3.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,096.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32848 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32848 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data