Authorization Bypass (IDOR)Weakness · CWE-639

CVE-2023-3285

HIGH · 7.7 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-09
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
83/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A BOLA vulnerability in POST /appointments allows a low privileged user to create an appointment for any user in the system (including admin). This results in unauthorized data manipulation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A BOLA (Broken Object Level Authorization) vulnerability in the POST /appointments endpoint allows authenticated low-privilege users to create appointments on behalf of any user in the system, including administrators, due to missing or insufficient authorization validation on the target user parameter.

MitigationImplement and enforce proper object-level authorization checks to verify the authenticated user has permission to create appointments for the specified target user before processing the request.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify if the /appointments endpoint exists and accepts POST requests
    Review application API documentation or use a network proxy to capture traffic and confirm the POST /appointments endpoint is exposed and functional in your environment
    Affected if The endpoint exists and processes POST requests without explicit testing of authorization boundaries
  2. Determine the authentication requirements for the /appointments endpoint
    Attempt to send a POST request to /appointments without authentication headers or credentials and observe the response (401 Unauthorized indicates authentication is required; 200/201 indicates it may be accessible without auth)
    Affected if The endpoint accepts requests from unauthenticated users or accepts any authenticated session without privilege validation
  3. Test whether a low-privilege user can specify a target user ID in the appointment creation request
    Log in with a low-privilege user account and submit a POST request to /appointments with a payload containing a target user parameter (such as user_id, target_user, or owner_id) set to a different user's ID (such as an admin account). Inspect the response and verify if the appointment was created for that other user
    Affected if A low-privilege authenticated user can successfully create an appointment for a different user, including administrators, without receiving a 403 Forbidden response
  4. Check if the application validates authorization before creating appointments
    Review application logs or enable debug logging, then attempt to create an appointment as a low-privilege user targeting a privileged account. Look for authorization check logic in the backend code or proxy intercepts to confirm whether the server validates that the requester has permission to act on behalf of the target user
    Affected if No authorization validation occurs or the validation can be bypassed by manipulating the target user parameter in the request
  5. Compare your deployed application version to any documented affected versions
    Check the application version in use (typically found in about pages, HTTP headers, source code, or configuration files) and compare it to any version ranges mentioned in CVE-2023-3285 documentation or release notes for the affected product
    Affected if The installed version falls within the range where this BOLA vulnerability exists and has not been patched
  6. Verify if input validation exists for the target user parameter
    Intercept the POST /appointments request and examine the request body for user-referencing parameters (userId, user_id, targetUser, etc.). Attempt to send requests with manipulated values or unexpected data types and check if the application rejects them or processes them blindly
    Affected if The application accepts any value for the target user parameter without validating it against the authenticated user's identity or permissions

A user is affected if the POST /appointments endpoint allows an authenticated low-privilege user to create appointments for other users (including administrators) by specifying a target user parameter, indicating missing or insufficient authorization validation.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement and enforce proper object-level authorization checks to verify the authenticated user has permission to create appointments for the specified target user before processing the request.

Have this fixed Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
15.0 hours of engineering $2,640
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,224.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3285 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3285 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data