CVE-2023-32855
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn aee, there is a possible escalation of privilege due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with System execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation. Patch ID: ALPS07909204; Issue ID: ALPS07909204.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA missing permission check in the aee (Application Event Executor - a MediaTek system service) component allows a local attacker with System execution privileges to escalate to higher privileges. The vulnerability stems from insufficient authorization validation within the aee daemon, enabling privilege escalation without user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.6= 3.3= 4.0= 2022q3= 12.0= 13.0= 19.07.0= 21.02CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- High
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify MediaTek chipset usageCheck system information for MediaTek processor or chipset identifiers (e.g., via 'cat /proc/cpuinfo', 'dmesg', or system property 'ro.hardware' or 'ro.chipname'). This vulnerability affects only MediaTek-based devices.Affected if The device uses a MediaTek SoC (System-on-Chip). If the system uses a different vendor (Qualcomm, Samsung Exynos, etc.), this specific vulnerability does not apply.
-
Verify aee daemon presenceCheck if the aee (Application Event Executor) service exists on the system. Look for '/system/bin/aee' or '/vendor/bin/aee' or check running processes for 'aee' or 'aee_dump' via 'ps -A | grep -i aee'.Affected if The aee daemon is present and running on the device.
-
Confirm Android versionCheck the Android version by running 'getprop ro.build.version.release' or viewing 'Settings > About Phone > Android version'.Affected if The device runs Android 12.0 or Android 13.0, as listed in the affected versions for Google Android.
-
Confirm Yocto version (if applicable)Check the Yocto version via 'cat /etc/lsb-release' or 'cat /etc/os-release' or check the kernel boot parameters.Affected if The system runs Yocto version 2.6, 3.3, or 4.0.
-
Confirm OpenWRT version (if applicable)Check the OpenWRT version via 'cat /etc/openwrt_version' or 'cat /etc/os-release'.Affected if The system runs OpenWRT version 19.07.0 or 21.02.
-
Check for vendor patch ALPS07909204Query the system build or patch level for evidence of the fix. On Android, check 'getprop ro.build.version.security_patch' or review OTA update history. The presence of the patch indicates remediation.Affected if The system patch level predates the fix (ALPS07909204), meaning the missing permission check vulnerability remains unpatched.
A device is affected if it uses a MediaTek chipset, runs the listed vulnerable Android/Yocto/OpenWRT versions, contains the aee daemon, and lacks the vendor security patch ALPS07909204.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataApply the vendor patch ALPS07909204 via system OTA update. Since this is a MediaTek system component, contact the device manufacturer for the patched system image.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,928.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-32855 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-32855 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data