EasyappointmentsApplication

CVE-2023-3287

HIGH · 8.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-07-09
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later.
See remediation →
94/100
Remediation priority · Urgent
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
A BOLA vulnerability in POST /admins allows a low privileged user to create a high privileged user (admin) in the system. This results in privilege escalation.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

A Broken Object Level Authorization (BOLA) vulnerability in the POST /admins endpoint allows any authenticated low-privilege user to create high-privileged admin accounts by bypassing role-based access controls on the user creation function.

MitigationImplement proper authorization checks to verify the requester's role before allowing admin account creation; enforce role validation on all administrative endpoints.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
EasyappointmentsApplication
Affected:< 1.5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify the installed Easyappointments version
    Locate the version file or version definition in the Easyappointments installation directory (commonly found in version.php, composer.json, or a config/version file within the application root)
    Affected if The version is lower than 1.5.0
  2. Verify the /admins endpoint exists
    Inspect the application routing configuration or source code to confirm the POST /admins endpoint is defined and accessible
    Affected if The endpoint exists and is reachable without proper role validation in the routing/Controller code
  3. Check for role-based authorization on admin creation
    Review the source code handling the POST /admins request to determine if role verification (checking if the requester is an admin) occurs before processing the request
    Affected if No role check or an insufficient role check is performed before allowing admin account creation
  4. Test low-privilege user access to admin creation
    Using a low-privilege authenticated user account, attempt to send a POST request to /admins to create an admin-level account
    Affected if The low-privilege user can successfully create an admin account without receiving a 403 Forbidden or authorization error

You are affected if Easyappointments version is below 1.5.0 and the POST /admins endpoint allows low-privilege authenticated users to create admin accounts without proper authorization checks.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 1.5.0 or later
Fixed in 1.5.0
Interim mitigation

Implement proper authorization checks to verify the requester's role before allowing admin account creation; enforce role validation on all administrative endpoints.

Recommended fix High confidence

Easyappointments 1.5.0

  1. 1. Back up your existing Easyappointments database and files before proceeding with the upgrade.
  2. 2. Download Easyappointments version 1.5.0 or later from the official repository (github.com/alextselegidis/easyappointments).
  3. 3. Replace the existing application files with the new version files, preserving your configuration file (typically config.php) and any customizations.
  4. 4. Verify that the application functions correctly by logging in and testing the admin user creation functionality.
  5. 5. Confirm that low-privileged users can no longer create admin-level users through the POST /admins endpoint.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Easyappointments Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing3.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
11.0 hours of engineering $1,930
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,088.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3287 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3287 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data