Ns Nd Integration Performance PublisherApplication · Jenkins
CVE-2023-33000
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin 4.8.0.149 and earlier does not mask credentials displayed on the configuration form, increasing the potential for attackers to observe and capture them.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin versions 4.8.0.149 and earlier fails to mask credentials entered in the plugin configuration form, causing sensitive authentication credentials to be displayed in plain text or visible to users with access to the configuration page.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data
Ns Nd Integration Performance PublisherApplication
<= 4.8.0.149CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed and search for 'NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher' or 'ns-nd-integration-performance-publisher'Affected if Plugin is not installed in Jenkins instance
-
Check installed plugin versionIn Manage Plugins > Installed tab, locate the NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher plugin and note the Version columnAffected if Version is 4.8.0.149 or earlier
-
Access plugin configurationNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure System and locate the 'NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher' section, or check job configuration if credentials are set at job levelAffected if Configuration page is accessible and contains credential fields
-
Inspect credential maskingExamine the credential input fields in the NS-ND configuration section - verify if the input type is 'password' (masked) or 'text' (visible) and whether credentials appear as plain textAffected if Credentials field type is 'text' or credentials are displayed in plain text rather than masked with dots or asterisks
User is affected if the NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher plugin version 4.8.0.149 or earlier is installed AND credentials entered in the plugin configuration appear as plain text instead of being masked.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate the NS-ND Integration Performance Publisher Plugin to a version newer than 4.8.0.149 that properly masks credentials in the configuration form, and verify that credentials are no longer visible in plain text.
Fix this in Ns Nd Integration Performance Publisher
Scoped from the published advisory
- Consultation1.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,376.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33000 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33000 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data