CVE-2023-33005
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedJenkins WSO2 Oauth Plugin 1.0 and earlier does not invalidate the previous session on login.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceThe Jenkins WSO2 OAuth Plugin versions 1.0 and earlier contains a session fixation vulnerability where it fails to invalidate the previous session upon user login. This could allow an attacker who has obtained a valid session ID to maintain access after the legitimate user authenticates via OAuth.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data<= 1.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if WSO2 OAuth Plugin is installedNavigate to Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Manage Plugins > Installed tab, or run: jenkins-cli.jar get-plugins (or via /pluginManager/installed API). Look for 'wso2-oauth' or 'WSO2 OAuth' in the plugin list.Affected if The plugin named WSO2 OAuth or wso2-oauth appears in the installed plugins list.
-
Determine the installed plugin versionIn the installed plugins list, note the version number shown next to the WSO2 OAuth plugin. If using CLI/API, retrieve the plugin's manifest or version metadata.Affected if The version is 1.0 or any version lower than 1.0 (e.g., 0.x, 1.0-beta, etc.).
-
Verify OAuth authentication is configuredCheck Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security > Security Realm. Look for WSO2 OAuth, OAuth2, or similar WSO2-based authentication option selected as the security realm.Affected if WSO2 OAuth or WSO2 OAuth-based authentication is selected as the active Security Realm, meaning users authenticate via the vulnerable OAuth flow.
-
Inspect session handling configurationIf accessible, review Jenkins > Manage Jenkins > Configure Global Security for any session-related settings, or check the plugin's configuration page under Manage Jenkins. Look for session timeout, session fixation protection, or session management options specific to the OAuth plugin.Affected if Session fixation protection is not explicitly enabled or configured; the plugin relies on default session handling.
You are affected if the WSO2 OAuth plugin version 1.0 or earlier is installed AND WSO2 OAuth authentication is actively configured as the security realm in Jenkins.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataUpdate to a patched version of the WSO2 OAuth Plugin when released. Until then, monitor session activity closely and consider implementing additional session monitoring controls.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation1.0 h
- Testing2.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,696.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33005 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33005 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data