CVE-2023-3313
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn OS common injection vulnerability exists in the ESM certificate API, whereby incorrectly neutralized special elements may have allowed an unauthorized user to execute system command injection for the purpose of privilege escalation or to execute arbitrary commands.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA command injection vulnerability exists in the ESM certificate API where improperly sanitized user input in certificate processing allows attackers to inject OS commands. This could enable privilege escalation from an unauthorized user context or execution of arbitrary system commands.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 11.6.7CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify if Trellix Enterprise Security Manager is installedLocate the ESM installation directory or check system services for 'Trellix' or 'ESM' processes. Common paths may include C:\Program Files\Trellix\ESM or /opt/trellix/esm.Affected if Trellix Enterprise Security Manager software is present on the system
-
Determine the installed ESM versionCheck the ESM version through the product interface, About dialog, or version file in the installation directory. Look for a version file named version.ini, version.txt, or check the Windows registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Trellix\ESM for the Version value.Affected if The installed version is lower than 11.6.7 (e.g., 11.5.x, 11.4.x, etc.)
-
Verify the ESM certificate API is accessibleCheck if the ESM certificate API endpoint is exposed or enabled. This may be configurable in the ESM management console under API settings, or check for certificate-related service ports responding.Affected if The certificate API is enabled and accessible to the user in question
-
Inspect certificate processing configurationReview ESM configuration files related to certificate handling, typically found in the config subdirectory of the ESM installation. Look for files named cert.ini, certificate.xml, or similar that define certificate processing behavior.Affected if Certificate processing is configured with user-controlled input paths or parameters without sanitization
A system is affected if Trellix Enterprise Security Manager version 11.6.7 or lower is installed with the certificate API enabled and certificate processing configured to accept user input.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped11.6.7
Implement strict input validation and use parameterized APIs or safe library functions instead of passing user-controlled data to system command execution functions. Apply principle of least privilege to the certificate processing service.
11.6.7
- Verify current Enterprise Security Manager version through the ESM web interface or command line interface
- Download the ESM 11.6.7 update package from the official Trellix support portal at kcm.trellix.com
- Review release notes for any pre-upgrade requirements or migration procedures
- Execute the upgrade following the standard ESM upgrade process documented in the Trellix installation guide
- Verify successful installation by confirming the ESM version displays as 11.6.7 or later
- Test that the ESM certificate API functionality operates normally after the upgrade
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3313 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3313 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data