Contact Form Entries Contact Form 7 Wpforms And MoreWordPress extension · Crmperks

CVE-2023-33311

MEDIUM · 5.4 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-28
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.3.0 or later.
See remediation →
58/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Auth. (contributor+) Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability in CRM Perks Contact Form Entries plugin <= 1.3.0 versions.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Authenticated contributor+ users can inject malicious JavaScript via form submission fields in the CRM Perks Contact Form Entries plugin. The injected script is stored in the database and executes when admin users view the contact form entries, achieving stored XSS.

MitigationUpgrade to plugin version >1.3.0 which includes proper input sanitization and output escaping. Until then, restrict contributor+ role permissions and monitor for suspicious form submissions.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Contact Form Entries Contact Form 7 Wpforms And MoreWordPress extension
Affected:<= 1.3.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify CRM Perks Contact Form Entries plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin > Plugins and look for 'Crmperks Contact Form Entries' or 'Contact Form 7 Wpforms And More', or run: wp plugin list --name='*crm*'
    Affected if Plugin is installed and active
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In Plugins list, click 'View Details' on the CRM Perks plugin, or inspect the main plugin file header in wp-content/plugins/crm-perks-contact-form-entries/
    Affected if Version number is 1.3.0 or lower
  3. Confirm contributor+ role access exists
    Review user roles in WordPress admin > Users > Roles, or check if any users with contributor, author, or editor roles exist who can access the plugin's form submission functionality
    Affected if Users with contributor or higher roles exist and can submit forms through the plugin
  4. Inspect database for suspicious script content in form entries
    Query the plugin's form entry database table (commonly wp_cf7_cl_entry or similar, check plugin documentation for exact table name) for entries containing <script, javascript:, onload, onerror, or other HTML/script tags in submission fields
    Affected if Form entry records contain unsanitized HTML or script tags in submission data
  5. Check if admin users view form entries
    Log in as administrator and navigate to the plugin's form entries list page where admin users review submitted contact form data
    Affected if Admin users access the form entries viewing interface

User is affected if the CRM Perks Contact Form Entries plugin version is 1.3.0 or lower, contributor or higher role users can submit forms, and unsanitized script content exists in the database form entries that would execute when admins view them.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.3.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to plugin version >1.3.0 which includes proper input sanitization and output escaping. Until then, restrict contributor+ role permissions and monitor for suspicious form submissions.

Fix this in Contact Form Entries Contact Form 7 Wpforms And More Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation3.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing5.0 h
  • Review / QA3.0 h
17.0 hours of engineering $2,970
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33311 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33311 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data