Front End UsersWordPress extension · Etoilewebdesign

CVE-2023-33322

MEDIUM · 6.1 CVSS v3.1 Published 2024-03-26
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 3.2.25 or later.
See remediation →
68/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Etoile Web Design Front End Users allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Front End Users: from n/a before 3.2.25.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Reflected XSS vulnerability in Etoile Web Design Front End Users plugin allows attackers to inject malicious JavaScript through unsanitized user input that gets reflected in web pages without proper output encoding.

MitigationUpgrade Front End Users plugin to version 3.2.25 or later which contains the fix for this XSS vulnerability.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Front End UsersWordPress extension
Affected:< 3.2.25

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Changed
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
Low
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Verify Front End Users plugin is installed
    Navigate to WordPress admin dashboard > Plugins > Installed Plugins and look for 'Front End Users' by Etoilewebdesign in the list
    Affected if The plugin is installed and active in WordPress
  2. Check installed plugin version
    In the Plugins list, locate Front End Users and view the version number displayed under the plugin name. Alternatively, check the plugin's main PHP file header for 'Version:' tag
    Affected if The installed version is less than 3.2.25 (for example, 3.2.24, 3.2.0, or earlier)
  3. Identify exposed user input forms
    Visit pages containing Front End Users forms (registration, profile edit, user directory) and inspect HTML source for input fields that accept user-supplied values
    Affected if Forms accepting user input are publicly accessible without admin authentication
  4. Test for reflected parameter behavior
    Submit test input with special characters (such as <script>alert(1)</script>) in publicly accessible Front End Users form fields, then examine the response page to see if input is reflected without encoding
    Affected if User-supplied input appears unescaped in the rendered page HTML (visible in browser dev tools or page source)

You are affected if the Front End Users plugin is installed with a version lower than 3.2.25 AND publicly accessible forms reflect user input without proper encoding.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 3.2.25 or later
Fixed in 3.2.25
Interim mitigation

Upgrade Front End Users plugin to version 3.2.25 or later which contains the fix for this XSS vulnerability.

Recommended fix Moderate confidence

Front End Users version 3.2.25

  1. 1. Backup your current installation before making any changes.
  2. 2. Locate the Front End Users component/module in your Etoile Web Design application.
  3. 3. Upgrade the Front End Users component to version 3.2.25 or later.
  4. 4. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the installed version.
  5. 5. Test the application to confirm the XSS vulnerability is resolved.

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Front End Users Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
7.0 hours of engineering $1,240
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,984.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33322 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33322 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data