CVE-2023-3349
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedInformation exposure vulnerability in IBERMATICA RPS 2019, which exploitation could allow an unauthenticated user to retrieve sensitive information, such as usernames, IP addresses or SQL queries sent to the application. By accessing the URL /RPS2019Service/status.html, the application enables the logging mechanism by generating the log file, which can be downloaded.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an information disclosure vulnerability in IBERMATICA RPS 2019 where the /RPS2019Service/status.html endpoint triggers the generation of application log files that can be downloaded by unauthenticated users, exposing sensitive data such as usernames, IP addresses, and SQL queries.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2019CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm IBERMATICA RPS 2019 installationInspect the web server directories or running services for presence of RPS2019 or Ibermatica application files. Check for the /RPS2019Service/ path in the web root.Affected if The IBERMATICA RPS 2019 application is installed and accessible via web server.
-
Test endpoint accessibilityAttempt to access http://<host>/RPS2019Service/status.html using a web browser or curl command without providing any authentication credentials.Affected if The endpoint returns a response (200 OK) without requiring login or authentication.
-
Verify log file download capabilitySubmit a request to the status.html endpoint and observe if it returns or references downloadable log files. Check response for links to .log, .txt, or similar file extensions.Affected if Log files can be downloaded directly from the status.html endpoint without authentication.
-
Inspect exposed log contentDownload any accessible log files and examine their contents for sensitive information such as usernames, IP addresses, SQL queries, or other application data.Affected if The downloaded logs contain usernames, IP addresses, SQL queries, or other sensitive operational data.
A user is affected if IBERMATICA RPS 2019 is installed, the /RPS2019Service/status.html endpoint is publicly accessible without authentication, and log files containing sensitive data can be downloaded.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataRestrict or disable public access to the /RPS2019Service/status.html endpoint and ensure authentication is required for accessing any logging or status functionality. If logging is required, implement proper access controls and avoid logging sensitive information.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing1.0 h
- Review / QA1.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $1,744.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3349 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3349 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data