Magic R300 2100m FirmwareOperating system · H3c

CVE-2023-33636

HIGH · 7.2 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-31
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
78/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
H3C Magic R300 version R300-2100MV100R004 was discovered to contain a stack overflow via the ipqos_lanip_editlist interface at /goform/aspForm.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Stack overflow vulnerability in H3C Magic R300 router firmware R300-2100MV100R004. The overflow occurs in the ipqos_lanip_editlist form handler at /goform/aspForm, allowing potential remote code execution via crafted input exceeding stack buffer boundaries.

MitigationApply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise, restrict administrative access to the device management interface through network segmentation or firewall rules to prevent unauthenticated attackers from reaching the /goform/aspForm endpoint.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Magic R300 2100m FirmwareOperating system
Affected:= r300-2100mv100r004

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
High
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify device model
    Check if the device is an H3C Magic R300 2100m router by accessing the device web interface or checking the device label/firmware identification
    Affected if Device is not an H3C Magic R300 2100m router, then not affected by this specific CVE
  2. Check installed firmware version
    Access the router administration interface and navigate to the status or system information page to view the firmware version, or use the command line to retrieve the firmware version string
    Affected if Firmware version is not exactly R300-2100MV100R004, then not affected by this specific CVE (only this exact version is listed as affected)
  3. Verify ipqos feature is enabled
    Access the router web interface and check the QoS or IP QoS settings configuration page to determine if the ipqos feature is configured or enabled
    Affected if The ipqos feature is disabled or not configured, then the vulnerable ipqos_lanip_editlist form handler is not accessible and the device is not affected by this specific flaw
  4. Confirm /goform/aspForm endpoint accessibility
    Attempt to access the /goform/aspForm endpoint on the router (typically requires authentication) or check the router's web server configuration for this endpoint
    Affected if The /goform/aspForm endpoint is accessible (even with authentication), the stack overflow vulnerability in the ipqos_lanip_editlist form handler is present in the affected firmware version

A user is affected if they have an H3C Magic R300 2100m router running exactly firmware version R300-2100MV100R004 with the ipqos feature enabled and the /goform/aspForm endpoint accessible.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Apply vendor firmware patch if available; otherwise, restrict administrative access to the device management interface through network segmentation or firewall rules to prevent unauthenticated attackers from reaching the /goform/aspForm endpoint.

Fix this in Magic R300 2100m Firmware Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
18.0 hours of engineering $3,200
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33636 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33636 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data