CVE-2023-33933
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedExposure of Sensitive Information to an Unauthorized Actor vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache Traffic Server.This issue affects Apache Traffic Server: from 8.0.0 through 9.2.0. 8.x users should upgrade to 8.1.7 or later versions 9.x users should upgrade to 9.2.1 or later versions
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache Traffic Server versions 8.0.0 through 9.2.0 contain an information disclosure vulnerability allowing unauthorized actors to access sensitive information. This is a HIGH-severity (CVSS 7.5) vulnerability specific to the caching proxy server functionality.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 8.0.0, < 8.1.7>= 9.0.0, < 9.2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm Apache Traffic Server is installedRun 'which traffic_server' or check for the binary at common paths like /usr/bin/traffic_server or /usr/local/bin/traffic_server. Also check package managers: 'rpm -qa | grep -i traffic' or 'dpkg -l | grep -i traffic'.Affected if The traffic_server binary exists on the system.
-
Determine the installed versionRun 'traffic_server --version' or 'traffic_ctl version' to obtain the exact version number. If these commands are unavailable, check the package version via 'rpm -q trafficserver' or 'dpkg -l trafficserver'.Affected if The version displayed falls within the ranges >= 8.0.0 and < 8.1.7, or >= 9.0.0 and < 9.2.1.
-
Verify caching proxy functionality is in useExamine the Traffic Server configuration directory (commonly /etc/trafficserver/ or /usr/local/etc/trafficserver/). Check records.yaml for proxy.config.http.enabled set to 1, and review remap.config for active proxy mapping rules.Affected if The proxy.http.enabled setting is enabled or remap.config contains active forwarding rules, indicating the caching proxy feature is active.
-
Confirm proxy service is exposedCheck network listening status with 'ss -tlnp | grep 8080' or 'netstat -tlnp | grep 8080' (default proxy port), or review bind configuration in records.yaml under proxy.config.http.server_ports.Affected if The proxy port is listening and accessible, meaning the vulnerable service is exposed.
If Apache Traffic Server is running with the caching proxy enabled and the installed version is 8.0.0 through 9.2.0 (specifically < 8.1.7 or < 9.2.1), the environment is affected by CVE-2023-33933.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped8.1.79.2.1
Upgrade Apache Traffic Server to version 8.1.7 or later for 8.x installations, or 9.2.1 or later for 9.x installations, following standard upgrade procedures and regression testing.
8.x -> 8.1.7 or later; 9.x -> 9.2.1 or later
- 1. Identify the currently installed Apache Traffic Server version using: traffic_server -V or atsversion -a
- 2. For 8.x versions (8.0.0 to 8.1.6): Upgrade to version 8.1.7 or later
- 3. For 9.x versions (9.0.0 to 9.2.0): Upgrade to version 9.2.1 or later
- 4. Obtain the appropriate package for your distribution from https://traffic.apache.org/downloads/ or your system's package manager
- 5. Install the upgraded package following standard procedures for your operating system
- 6. Restart the Traffic Server service: traffic_ctl server restart or systemctl restart traffic_server
- 7. Verify the upgrade was successful by running: traffic_server -V
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33933 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33933 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data