CVE-2023-33939
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedCross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the Modified Facet widget in Liferay Portal 7.1.0 through 7.4.3.12, and Liferay DXP 7.1 before fix pack 27, 7.2 before fix pack 18, 7.3 before update 4, and 7.4 before update 9 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via a crafted payload injected into a facet label.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceStored XSS vulnerability in Lifer's Modified Facet widget allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary JavaScript/HTML through crafted payloads in the facet label parameter. The unsanitized input is persisted and executed when other users view the affected facet.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 7.1= 7.2= 7.3= 7.4>= 7.1.0, <= 7.4.3.12CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- Required
- Scope
- Changed
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check Lifer Portal/DXP versionLocate the Lifer Portal or DXP version in the control panel under Server > Server Information, or check the portal-ext.properties file for the version property.Affected if The installed version is 7.1.0 through 7.4.3.12, or matches DXP versions 7.1, 7.2, 7.3, or 7.4.
-
Identify Modified Facet widget usageSearch the Lifer instance for any pages or portlets using the 'Modified Facet' widget. This can be done through the Lifer UI by viewing page configurations or by querying the portlet preferences database tables.Affected if The Modified Facet widget is deployed and active on any page in the environment.
-
Inspect facet label configurations in databaseQuery the Lifer database for entries in the Layout_Friendly_URL or similar facet-related tables, specifically looking at fields that store facet label configuration data for suspicious HTML or JavaScript content.Affected if Any facet label contains unsanitized HTML script tags, event handlers, or javascript: URIs.
-
Verify user access controls for facet configurationReview the Lifer roles and permissions to determine which users or roles have permission to configure or modify facet widgets. Check under Control Panel > Users > Roles and Control Panel > Configuration > Facet Configuration.Affected if Users without proper security training have the ability to modify facet labels.
A user is affected if they run a vulnerable Lifer Portal/DXP version and have the Modified Facet widget in use with untrusted users able to configure facet labels containing malicious scripts.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the relevant security patches: Lifer Portal 7.4.3.12 or later, DXP 7.1 Fix Pack 27+, DXP 7.2 Fix Pack 18+, DXP 7.3 Update 4+, or DXP 7.4 Update 9+. Alternatively, implement input validation and output encoding on the facet label field.
Lifer DXP: 7.1 fix pack 27+, 7.2 fix pack 18+, 7.3 update 4+, 7.4 update 9+ | Lifer Portal: 7.4.3.13+
- Identify whether you are running Lifer Portal or Lifer DXP and note your current version number
- If using Lifer DXP 7.1.x, apply fix pack 27 or later
- If using Lifer DXP 7.2.x, apply fix pack 18 or later
- If using Lifer DXP 7.3.x, apply update 4 or later
- If using Lifer DXP 7.4.x, apply update 9 or later
- If using Lifer Portal 7.1.0 through 7.4.3.12, upgrade to Lifer Portal 7.4.3.13 or later (or latest 7.4.x stable release)
- After upgrading, verify the Modified Facet widget functions correctly and test that XSS payloads in facet labels are no longer executed
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-33939 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-33939 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data