CVE-2023-34165
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthorized access vulnerability in the Save for later feature provided by AI Touch.Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may cause third-party apps to forge a URI for unauthorized access with zero permissions.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceThis is an authorization bypass vulnerability in AI Touch's Android app 'Save for later' feature. The vulnerability allows malicious third-party apps to forge URIs and gain unauthorized access to saved content without requiring any permissions, effectively bypassing Android's permission model.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 2.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- Low
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Verify HarmonyOS versionCheck system settings > About Phone > Version to confirm HarmonyOS version is 2.1Affected if HarmonyOS version is exactly 2.1 (other versions are not affected)
-
Identify AI Touch app installationSearch for AI Touch app in the app list or check installed packages using adb: adb shell pm list packages | grep -i 'aitouch' or 'saveforlater'Affected if AI Touch app with Save for later feature is installed on the device
-
Check if Save for later feature exposes content providerUse adb to inspect the app's manifest components: adb shell dumpsys package <package_name> | grep -i 'provider' to see exported content providersAffected if The app exports a content provider without proper permission checks
-
Test URI permission handlingAttempt to construct and query a content:// URI that would be used by the Save for later feature from a non-privileged test app to see if access is granted without permissionAffected if External apps can access saved content URIs without holding any permissions (authorization bypass confirmed)
A user is affected if running HarmonyOS 2.1 with AI Touch app installed that contains the vulnerable Save for later feature, and external apps can access saved content without authorization.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
From vendor dataAI Touch should implement proper URI permission validation and add explicit permission checks in the Save for later feature to ensure only authorized apps can access the content. The fix requires updating the app's intent handling and content provider access controls.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-34165 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-34165 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data