InlongApplication · Apache

CVE-2023-34189

MEDIUM · 6.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-07-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 1.7.0 or later.
See remediation →
71/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Exposure of Resource to Wrong Sphere Vulnerability in Apache Software Foundation Apache InLong.This issue affects Apache InLong: from 1.4.0 through 1.7.0. The attacker could use general users to delete and update the process, which only the admin can operate occurrences.  Users are advised to upgrade to Apache InLong's 1.8.0 or cherry-pick https://github.com/apache/inlong/pull/8109  to solve it.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

Apache InLong versions 1.4.0-1.7.0 contain an authorization bypass where general users can delete and update processes that should only be accessible to administrators. This is a privilege escalation vulnerability where the application fails to properly enforce role-based access controls on certain API endpoints.

MitigationUpgrade to Apache InLong 1.8.0 or cherry-pick PR #8109 to implement proper authorization checks for admin-only operations.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
InlongApplication
Affected:>= 1.4.0, <= 1.7.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
Low
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
None
Integrity
High
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Identify Apache InLong installed version
    Check the InLong version by reviewing the product release documentation, startup logs, or the about/page in the InLong admin console. Compare this version number against the affected range: 1.4.0 through 1.7.0.
    Affected if The installed version falls within >= 1.4.0 and <= 1.7.0.
  2. Confirm presence of non-admin users
    Review the user management section of the InLong admin console or query the user database to identify accounts assigned roles other than administrator.
    Affected if There are users with non-administrator roles defined in the system.
  3. Inspect API endpoint authorization configuration
    Examine the InLong configuration files or role permission settings to identify which API endpoints are designated as admin-only, particularly those for process deletion and update operations.
    Affected if Process deletion and update endpoints are marked as admin-only but lack enforced role checks.
  4. Verify role-based access control enforcement
    Using a non-admin user account, attempt to access API endpoints for process deletion or update operations. Observe whether the requests are rejected or allowed.
    Affected if Non-admin users can successfully delete or update processes through the API.

Your environment is affected if you are running Apache InLong version 1.4.0 through 1.7.0 and non-administrator users can access admin-only process deletion or update endpoints.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 1.7.0
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Apache InLong 1.8.0 or cherry-pick PR #8109 to implement proper authorization checks for admin-only operations.

Recommended fix High confidence

1.8.0

  1. Upgrade Apache InLong from any version between 1.4.0 and 1.7.0 to version 1.8.0 or later to resolve the privilege escalation vulnerability that allows general users to delete and update admin-only processes

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Inlong Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation8.0 h
  • Testing8.0 h
  • Review / QA4.0 h
24.0 hours of engineering $4,160
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-34189 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-34189 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data