CVE-2023-34212
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedThe JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider Controller Service, along with the ConsumeJMS and PublishJMS Processors, in Apache NiFi 1.8.0 through 1.21.0 allow an authenticated and authorized user to configure URL and library properties that enable deserialization of untrusted data from a remote location. The resolution validates the JNDI URL and restricts locations to a set of allowed schemes. You are recommended to upgrade to version 1.22.0 or later which fixes this issue.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceApache NiFi versions 1.8.0-1.21.0 contain a JNDI injection vulnerability in the JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider Controller Service and ConsumeJMS/PublishJMS Processors. Authenticated users with authorization to configure these components can specify malicious JNDI URLs and library properties that enable deserialization of untrusted data from remote locations, potentially leading to remote code execution.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.8.0, <= 1.21.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check the installed NiFi versionNavigate to the NiFi UI footer or check the nifi-version.properties file in the NiFi installation directory. The version is typically displayed on the login page or in the about section.Affected if The version is between 1.8.0 and 1.21.0 inclusive.
-
Identify configured JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider Controller ServicesIn the NiFi UI, go to the Controller Settings (gear icon) and inspect the Controller Services tab. Look for any service with type JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider.Affected if A JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider service exists and is enabled.
-
Identify flows using ConsumeJMS ProcessorIn the NiFi UI, search for processors of type ConsumeJMS. This can be done by adding a processor and searching 'ConsumeJMS' in the processor type search, or by reviewing existing flow configurations.Affected if Any ConsumeJMS processor is configured in an active or enabled flow.
-
Identify flows using PublishJMS ProcessorIn the NiFi UI, search for processors of type PublishJMS. This can be done by adding a processor and searching 'PublishJMS' in the processor type search, or by reviewing existing flow configurations.Affected if Any PublishJMS processor is configured in an active or enabled flow.
-
Inspect JNDI configuration in vulnerable componentsFor any identified JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider, ConsumeJMS, or PublishJMS components, open their configuration and examine the JNDI URL and provider URL properties. Look for any non-standard or external JNDI URLs.Affected if The JNDI URL property points to a remote location or uses non-default provider settings.
A user is affected if their NiFi version is 1.8.0-1.21.0 and they have any JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider Controller Service, ConsumeJMS Processor, or PublishJMS Processor configured with JNDI settings.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade to Apache NiFi 1.22.0 or later, which implements validation of JNDI URLs and restricts them to an allowed set of schemes.
1.22.0 or later
- Download Apache NiFi version 1.22.0 or later from the official Apache NiFi distribution site (nifi.apache.org)
- Stop the currently running NiFi instance
- Back up the existing NiFi installation directory, including configuration files and flow.xml.gz
- Extract the new NiFi 1.22.0+ distribution to the target installation location
- Migrate any custom configuration files from the backup to the new installation (nifi.properties, bootstrap.conf, authorizers.xml, etc.)
- Review and update any custom processors or dependencies that may be affected by the JNDI URL validation changes
- Start the NiFi instance
- Verify the JndiJmsConnectionFactoryProvider, ConsumeJMS, and PublishJMS components are functioning correctly with the new validation in place
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing4.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $5,120.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-34212 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-34212 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data