TeamcityApplication · Jetbrains

CVE-2023-34223

MEDIUM · 5.3 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-05-31
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to 2023.05 or later.
See remediation →
62/100
Remediation priority · Elevated
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
In JetBrains TeamCity before 2023.05 parameters of the "password" type from build dependencies could be logged in some cases

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

In JetBrains TeamCity versions before 2023.05, password-type parameters from build dependencies could be inadvertently written to logs. This could expose sensitive credentials stored in password parameters to unauthorized parties with access to TeamCity log files.

MitigationUpgrade TeamCity to version 2023.05 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Review existing logs for any inadvertent password exposure as a precautionary measure.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
TeamcityApplication
Affected:< 2023.05

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
Low
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check TeamCity version
    Access the TeamCity administration UI, go to 'Administration' > 'Server Configuration', or query the server's buildConfig.properties file. Locate the version number displayed.
    Affected if The installed version is any release earlier than 2023.05 (for example, 2023.04.x, 2022.x, or earlier).
  2. Identify build configurations with dependencies using password parameters
    Review all build configurations that have dependencies on other projects or builds. For each dependency, check whether the dependency passes password-type parameters to the downstream build configuration.
    Affected if Build configurations exist that use build dependencies and those dependencies pass password-type parameters to the consuming build.
  3. Examine build logs for credential exposure
    Navigate to the TeamCity data directory, locate the logs folder, and search build log files for patterns matching password parameter names or their values. Use grep or similar search tools to scan .log files for occurrences of parameter names marked as 'password' type.
    Affected if Log files contain plaintext passwords or password parameter values from build dependency configurations.

You are affected if your TeamCity version is below 2023.05 and you have build dependencies that pass password-type parameters, with those credentials potentially visible in build logs.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to 2023.05 or later
Fixed in 2023.05
Interim mitigation

Upgrade TeamCity to version 2023.05 or later to remediate this vulnerability. Review existing logs for any inadvertent password exposure as a precautionary measure.

Recommended fix High confidence

2023.05

  1. Back up the TeamCity data directory and database before upgrading
  2. Download TeamCity 2023.05 or later from the official JetBrains website (www.jetbrains.com/teamcity/download)
  3. Stop the TeamCity server service
  4. Run the TeamCity installer/upgrade on the server
  5. Follow the installation wizard to complete the upgrade
  6. Start the TeamCity server service
  7. Log in to TeamCity and verify the build configuration works correctly
  8. Confirm that password-type parameters are no longer logged in build logs

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Teamcity Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation4.0 h
  • Testing2.0 h
  • Review / QA1.0 h
9.0 hours of engineering $1,600
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,560.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-34223 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-34223 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data