CVE-2023-3440
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIncorrect Default Permissions vulnerability in Hitachi JP1/Performance Management on Windows allows File Manipulation.This issue affects JP1/Performance Management - Manager: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Base: from 09-00 through 10-50-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Application Server: from 11-00 before 11-50-16; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Enterprise Applications: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for HiRDB: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM Lotus Domino: from 10-00 before 11-50-16; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Exchange Server: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) Internet Information Server: from 09-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Microsoft(R) SQL Server: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle: from 09-00 before 12-10-08; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Platform: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Service Response: from 09-00 before 11-50-16; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Transaction System: from 11-00 before 12-00-14; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Microsoft(R) SQL Server: from 09-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Oracle: from 09-00 before 12-10-08; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Platform: from 09-00 before 12-10-08; JP1/Performance Management - Remote Monitor for Virtual Machine: from 10-00 before 12-50-07; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Domino: from 09-00 through 09-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM WebSphere Application Server: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for IBM WebSphere MQ: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for JP1/AJS3: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for OpenTP1: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Oracle WebLogic Server: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for uCosminexus Application Server: from 09-00 through 10-00-*; JP1/Performance Management - Agent Option for Virtual Machine: from 09-00 through 09-01-*.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIncorrect default file permissions in Hitachi JP1/Performance Management on Windows allow local attackers to manipulate files they should not have access to. The vulnerability stems from overly permissive default ACLs on certain files or directories, enabling privilege escalation via file modification or replacement.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Local
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Check if JP1/Performance Management is installedLook for the JP1 installation directory in common locations such as C:\Program Files\Hitachi\JP1, C:\Hitachi\JP1, or check Windows Registry under HKLM\SOFTWARE\Hitachi for JP1 installation entriesAffected if The product is found installed on the system
-
Identify the JP1 installation root directoryLocate the main JP1 installation folder (commonly under Program Files\Hitachi or a custom path configured during installation)Affected if The installation directory exists and contains JP1 components
-
Review file permissions on the JP1 installation directoryRight-click the JP1 root folder, select Properties, go to the Security tab, and examine the granted permissions for each user or groupAffected if ACLs grant excessive permissions to non-admin users (such as Everyone, Users, or Authenticated Users having Write or Modify access to sensitive directories)
-
Inspect permissions on JP1 configuration and executable directoriesCheck ACLs on subdirectories containing configuration files (.conf, .ini, .xml) and executable files (.exe, .dll) within the JP1 installation folderAffected if Non-privileged users or groups have Write or Modify permissions on config or binary directories that should be restricted to administrators only
-
Verify if default permissions allow file modification by low-privileged accountsUsing icacls.exe from a limited user account context, attempt to list or modify files in the JP1 installation directory to confirm overly permissive accessAffected if A standard user account can successfully write, modify, or replace files in directories that should be protected
If Hitachi JP1/Performance Management is installed and the default ACLs on its installation directories grant Write or Modify access to non-administrative users or groups, the environment is affected by CVE-2023-3440.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply vendor-supplied patches to upgrade affected components to the fixed versions (e.g., Manager to 12-50-07, Base to 11-00 or later, Agent Options to their respective fixed releases). Review and harden file system permissions on JP1 installation directories as an interim measure.
JP1/Performance Management - Manager: 12-50-07 or later; Base: 10-51 or later; respective Agent Options and Remote Monitors at or above their respective threshold versions (e.g., 12-50-07, 12-10-08, 11-50-16, 12-00-14 as indicated by 'before' in version ranges)
- Contact Hitachi support to obtain the specific patch or updated version for your JP1/Performance Management product line
- Request the fixed versions: JP1/Performance Management - Manager 12-50-07 or later; Base 10-51 or later; Agent Options and Remote Monitors according to the thresholds in the advisory
- Test the updated version in a non-production environment before deploying
- Apply the update following Hitachi's standard upgrade procedures for JP1/Performance Management
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3440 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3440 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data