CVE-2023-3462
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedHashiCorp's Vault and Vault Enterprise are vulnerable to user enumeration when using the LDAP auth method. An attacker may submit requests of existent and non-existent LDAP users and observe the response from Vault to check if the account is valid on the LDAP server. This vulnerability is fixed in Vault 1.14.1 and 1.13.5.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceHashiCorp Vault and Vault Enterprise contain a user enumeration vulnerability in the LDAP authentication method. Attackers can submit login requests with different LDAP usernames and observe Vault's responses to determine which accounts are valid on the LDAP server. This information disclosure allows attackers to identify valid user accounts for further attacks.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 1.13.0, < 1.13.5= 1.14.0CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- Low
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- None
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify the installed Vault versionRun 'vault version' from the command line or check the version via the API at /sys/health or /sys/versionAffected if The version is 1.13.0 through 1.13.4 inclusive, or exactly 1.14.0
-
Verify if LDAP authentication method is enabledCheck Vault configuration or list enabled auth methods using 'vault auth list' command and look for 'ldap' in the outputAffected if LDAP auth method is enabled and mounted in Vault
-
Confirm LDAP auth method is configured with userdn/binddnReview the LDAP auth method configuration by running 'vault read auth/ldap/config' and verify if userdn or user_attr parameters are setAffected if LDAP auth is configured with user-based DN settings that allow username enumeration through response differences
-
Review authentication logs for user enumeration patternsCheck Vault audit logs or system logs for repeated login attempts with different usernames that produce distinct error messages (e.g., 'user not found' vs 'invalid credentials')Affected if Logs show multiple failed login attempts with different usernames producing differentiated responses indicating user enumeration activity
Your environment is affected if Vault is running version 1.13.0-1.13.4 or 1.14.0 AND LDAP authentication method is enabled and accessible to untrusted users.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.13.5
Upgrade Vault to version 1.14.1 or 1.13.5 to patch the vulnerability. Consider implementing rate limiting on authentication endpoints and monitoring for enumeration attack patterns as temporary mitigations.
Vault 1.14.1 (or Vault 1.13.5)
- 1. Back up your Vault data directory and configuration files before upgrading
- 2. Review the Vault 1.14.1 (or 1.13.5) release notes for any breaking changes that may affect your deployment
- 3. Stop the Vault service
- 4. Upgrade Vault to version 1.14.1 (recommended) or 1.13.5
- 5. Start the Vault service
- 6. Verify the upgrade was successful by checking the Vault version
- 7. Test LDAP authentication to confirm the user enumeration fix is working
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation3.0 h
- Implementation6.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $3,984.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3462 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3462 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data