CVE-2023-34644
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedRemote code execution vulnerability in Ruijie Networks Product: RG-EW series home routers and repeaters EW_3.0(1)B11P204, RG-NBS and RG-S1930 series switches SWITCH_3.0(1)B11P218, RG-EG series business VPN routers EG_3.0(1)B11P216, EAP and RAP series wireless access points AP_3.0(1)B11P218, NBC series wireless controllers AC_3.0(1)B11P86 allows unauthorized remote attackers to gain the highest privileges via crafted POST request to /cgi-bin/luci/api/auth.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysisThe application evaluates attacker-influenced input as code, handing them a way to run logic inside the process. Depending on the runtime this can escalate directly to remote code execution. Remediation means removing dynamic evaluation of untrusted input and replacing it with safe, data-driven alternatives.
General guidance for the code injection class — the official description and references above are authoritative for this specific CVE. Want a bespoke review and a reviewed fix? Ask our team →
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p204= 3.0\(1\)b11p216CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedFirmware version newer than EW_3.0(1)B11P204, EG_3.0(1)B11P216, SWITCH_3.0(1)B11P218, AP_3.0(1)B11P218, AC_3.0(1)B11P86 - obtain exact version from vendor advisory
- 1. Identify the exact model of your Ruijie device from the affected list (EW series routers, EG series VPN routers, NBS/S1930 switches, EAP/RAP access points, NBC controllers).
- 2. Visit the vendor security advisory at https://www.ruijie.com.cn/gy/xw-aqtg-gw/91389/ to obtain the patched firmware version for your specific model.
- 3. Download the patched firmware from the official Ruijie Networks support portal (www.ruijienetworks.com).
- 4. Backup the current device configuration before applying the firmware update.
- 5. Upload and apply the new firmware through the device's web management interface or CLI, following the vendor's upgrade instructions.
- 6. After upgrading, verify the device is operational and confirm the firmware version matches the patched release.
- 7. If the device supports it, disable the /cgi-bin/luci/api/auth endpoint or implement additional access controls if immediate upgrading is not feasible.
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-34644 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-34644 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data