CVE-2023-3519
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedUnauthenticated remote code execution
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · low confidenceCritical unauthenticated remote code execution vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix Gateway (formerly Citrix ADC). Attackers can execute arbitrary code on affected devices without any authentication, allowing full system compromise.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 12.1, < 12.1-55.297>= 13.0, < 13.0-91.13>= 13.1, < 13.1-37.159>= 13.1, < 13.1-49.13>= 13.0, < 13.0-91.13>= 13.1, < 13.1-49.13CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify Netscaler product typeLog into the Netscaler command line or web interface and determine if the product is NetScaler ADC or NetScaler Gateway. Run 'show version' or check the system information page.Affected if The system is running either Citrix Netscaler ADC or Gateway product types.
-
Check installed Netscaler versionExecute 'show version' via CLI or check the build number in the web interface under System > Information. Note the full version string including build number.Affected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 12.1 before 12.1-55.297; 13.0 before 13.0-91.13; 13.1 before 13.1-37.159; 13.1 before 13.1-49.13.
-
Verify management interface accessibilityCheck if the Netscaler management interface (NSIP-based web UI on port 80/443 or ntp.conf) is exposed to untrusted networks. Review firewall rules and access control lists.Affected if The management interface is reachable from untrusted or internet-facing networks without proper network segmentation.
-
Verify Gateway service exposureCheck if the NetScaler Gateway service (VPN portal, SSL VPN) is exposed externally. Review the enabled VIPs and their bound IP addresses.Affected if NetScaler Gateway is accessible from untrusted networks, as the vulnerability affects unauthenticated remote code execution.
-
Review authentication configurationCheck the authentication server settings and whether the default or weak authentication methods are in use. Run 'show aaa' or review AAA configuration.Affected if The system is configured with authentication that could be bypassed or is using default configurations.
A system is affected if it runs a vulnerable Netscaler ADC or Gateway version (12.1 before 55.297, 13.0 before 91.13, or 13.1 before 37.159/49.13) AND has its management or Gateway interface accessible from untrusted networks.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped12.1-55.29713.0-91.1313.1-37.159
Apply the vendor-provided security patches immediately. In the interim, disable the nsppe process or restrict access to the management interface via firewall rules.
12.1-55.297 (12.1 branch), 13.0-91.13 (13.0 branch), or 13.1-49.13 (13.1 branch)
- Identify the current NetScaler ADC or Gateway version by checking /ns version or the GUI System Information page
- Determine which release branch is in use: 12.1, 13.0, or 13.1
- For 12.1 branch: upgrade to version 12.1-55.297 or later
- For 13.0 branch: upgrade to version 13.0-91.13 or later
- For 13.1 branch: upgrade to version 13.1-49.13 or later
- After upgrade, verify successful installation by confirming the new version under System Information
- Apply any relevant configuration backup before upgrade and restore if needed after
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,176.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-3519 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-3519 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data