CVE-2023-35690
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIn RGXDestroyHWRTData of rgxta3d.c, there is a possible arbitrary code execution due to an uncaught exception. This could lead to local escalation of privilege in the kernel with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceA critical vulnerability exists in Imagination Technologies' PowerVR Rogue GPU driver (RGX) where the RGXDestroyHWRTData function in rgxta3d.c fails to catch an exception during hardware render target data destruction. This unhandled exception can be exploited for arbitrary code execution at kernel privilege level, enabling local privilege escalation without requiring user interaction.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE dataall versionsCVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Confirm PowerVR Rogue GPU is presentCheck /proc/cpuinfo for 'Imagination Technologies' or examine /sys/class/kgsl/kgsl-3d0/gpu_model if available. PowerVR Rogue GPU is typically found in MediaTek and some other ARM-based SoCs.Affected if The device does not use a PowerVR Rogue GPU, then this specific CVE does not apply.
-
Locate GPU driver filesSearch for RGX-related driver files in /vendor/lib/ (such as libIMGegl.so, libpvr*.so, or files containing 'rgx' in the filename). Also check /system/lib/ and /vendor/lib/hw/ for GPU driver libraries.Affected if No PowerVR RGX driver files are found on the device.
-
Identify driver versionRun 'cat /vendor/lib/modules/*/version' or use 'modinfo' on any loaded rgx kernel modules (typically named rgx.*.ko). For user-space drivers, check the file properties or metadata within the driver libraries.Affected if Unable to determine the PowerVR RGX driver version.
-
Compare against patched versionContact Imagination Technologies or check the GPU driver release notes for CVE-2023-35690 fix version information. Compare your identified driver version against the fixed release.Affected if The installed driver version predates the CVE-2023-35690 patch and the device uses PowerVR Rogue GPU.
-
Verify kernel-level exception handling existsIf driver source or symbol information is accessible, inspect the RGXDestroyHWRTData function (typically in rgxta3d.c or its compiled binary) for proper try-catch exception handling around hardware render target destruction logic.Affected if The driver lacks proper exception handling in RGXDestroyHWRTData and uses an unpatched version.
A device is affected if it runs Google Android with an unpatched PowerVR Rogue GPU (RGX) driver that lacks proper exception handling in the RGXDestroyHWRTData function.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the vendor-provided patch for CVE-2023-35690 which adds proper exception handling in the RGXDestroyHWRTData function. Given the kernel-level impact and critical severity, priority patching is essential.
Android device with November 2023 Android Security Bulletin or later applied (security patch level 2023-11-01 or later)
- 1. Check your device's current Android security patch level in Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
- 2. Identify the latest Android Security Bulletin from source.android.com that addresses CVE-2023-35690
- 3. If your device's security patch level is older than the bulletin containing the fix, check for system updates in Settings > System > Software Update
- 4. Apply any available system updates to receive the security patch containing the fix for this vulnerability
- 5. After updating, verify the Android security patch level reflects the fixed month/year in Settings > About Phone > Android security patch level
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing8.0 h
- Review / QA4.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $6,656.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-35690 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-35690 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data