WmproApplication · Sun.net

CVE-2023-35851

HIGH · 7.5 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-09-18
Mitigation only
No fix yet — a mitigation exists. There is no fixed release. A documented workaround reduces exposure in the meantime.
See remediation →
84/100
Remediation priority · High
Remotely reachable No privileges Zero-click

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
SUNNET WMPro portal's FAQ function has insufficient validation for user input. An unauthenticated remote attacker can inject arbitrary SQL commands to obtain sensitive information via a database.

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · high confidence

SQL injection vulnerability in the FAQ function of SUNNET WMPro portal allows unauthenticated remote attackers to inject arbitrary SQL commands through user input that lacks proper validation, enabling extraction of sensitive data from the database.

MitigationImplement parameterized queries (prepared statements) or proper input validation/sanitization in the FAQ function to prevent SQL injection, and conduct thorough security testing to verify the fix.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
WmproApplication
Affected:= 5.0

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Network
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
None
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
None
Availability
None

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Confirm Sun.net Wmpro is installed
    Locate the application installation directory or check system inventory for 'Wmpro' or 'SUNNET WMPro' software. Look for executable files, web application files, or service entries named 'wmpro' or containing 'sun.net'.
    Affected if The product Sun.net Wmpro is present on the system
  2. Verify the installed version is 5.0
    Check version information in application files, About dialog, or configuration files. Common locations: installation folder readme/version files, web.config (if web app), registry entries, or startup banner when launching the application.
    Affected if The installed version is exactly 5.0 (version range is single point)
  3. Determine if FAQ module is enabled
    Check if the FAQ function is accessible within the WMPro portal. This may require logging into the application and navigating to FAQ-related menu items, or checking the application's module configuration files.
    Affected if FAQ module is present and accessible to users
  4. Inspect FAQ function for user input handling
    Locate the FAQ functionality code or configuration. Examine how user input is processed in the FAQ feature - look for query parameters, form fields, or API endpoints that accept user-supplied data related to FAQ viewing or searching.
    Affected if The FAQ function accepts user input without visible sanitization or validation parameters in the request
  5. Check for SQL injection protection in FAQ code
    If source code or decompiled binaries are available, examine the FAQ function handler. Look for SQL query construction that uses user input directly, versus parameterized queries or input validation routines.
    Affected if User input in FAQ function appears to be concatenated directly into SQL queries without prepared statements or validation

The environment is affected if Sun.net Wmpro version 5.0 is installed and the FAQ module is accessible without the vulnerability being patched.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

From vendor data
Mitigation available No clean upgrade yet — mitigate in the meantime
Mitigation

Implement parameterized queries (prepared statements) or proper input validation/sanitization in the FAQ function to prevent SQL injection, and conduct thorough security testing to verify the fix.

Fix this in Wmpro Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation4.0 h
  • Implementation6.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
16.0 hours of engineering $2,840
Get help mitigating

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,544.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-35851 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-35851 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data