CVE-2023-35899
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedIBM Cloud Pak for Automation 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3, 22.0.1, and 22.0.2 is potentially vulnerable to CSV Injection. A remote attacker could execute arbitrary commands on the system, caused by improper validation of csv file contents. IBM X-Force ID: 259354.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · moderate confidenceIBM Cloud Pak for Automation is vulnerable to CSV Injection due to improper validation of CSV file contents. A remote attacker can embed malicious spreadsheet formulas (e.g., =cmd|'/C calc'!A0) into CSV files, which execute arbitrary commands when the file is opened in spreadsheet applications. The lack of input sanitization on CSV data allows formula injection leading to command execution on the affected system.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data= 18.0.0= 18.0.1= 18.0.2= 19.0.1= 19.0.2= 19.0.3= 20.0.1= 20.0.2= 20.0.3= 21.0.1= 21.0.2= 21.0.3CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify IBM Cloud Pak for Automation versionRun 'oc get icpa4 [deployment-name] -o jsonpath={.spec.version}' or check the operator deployment metadata for the installed version numberAffected if The installed version matches any of: 18.0.0, 18.0.1, 18.0.2, 19.0.1, 19.0.2, 19.0.3, 20.0.1, 20.0.2, 20.0.3, 21.0.1, 21.0.2, 21.0.3
-
Confirm CSV import or upload capability existsCheck the deployment for any Data Exchange, File Import, or CSV-related services (look for keywords like 'import', 'upload', 'csv', 'file' in pod names or service definitions)Affected if CSV import or file upload functionality is enabled in the deployment
-
Locate CSV processing componentsReview application logs or configuration maps for CSV parsing libraries or file upload endpoints (check for 'multipart' or 'text/csv' content-type handlers)Affected if The system processes CSV files through any import or data load feature
If the installed version is one of the listed versions AND the environment includes CSV file import or upload functionality, the system is potentially affected by this CSV injection vulnerability.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedApply the IBM patch for CVE-2023-35899 when available. Until then, implement input validation to sanitize or escape special characters (particularly formula-initiating characters like =, @, +, -) in CSV file contents before processing, and educate users about the risks of opening untrusted CSV files.
IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation 22.0.3 or later (or the latest available fixed release)
- 1. Identify the current installed version of IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation using the IBM Cloud Pak console or oc get icp4aCluster -n <namespace> command
- 2. Download the latest IBM Cloud Pak for Business Automation software from IBM Fix Central (https://www.ibm.com/support/fixcentral)
- 3. Follow the IBM Cloud Pak upgrade documentation to upgrade to a fixed release (22.0.3 or later)
- 4. After upgrade, verify the CSV injection vulnerability is resolved by confirming the IBM APAR fix is included
- 5. Test CSV import functionality to ensure normal operations work as expected
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation4.0 h
- Implementation16.0 h
- Testing12.0 h
- Review / QA8.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $11,072.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-35899 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-35899 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data