CVE-2023-35945
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedEnvoy is a cloud-native high-performance edge/middle/service proxy. Envoy’s HTTP/2 codec may leak a header map and bookkeeping structures upon receiving `RST_STREAM` immediately followed by the `GOAWAY` frames from an upstream server. In nghttp2, cleanup of pending requests due to receipt of the `GOAWAY` frame skips de-allocation of the bookkeeping structure and pending compressed header. The error return [code path] is taken if connection is already marked for not sending more requests due to `GOAWAY` frame. The clean-up code is right after the return statement, causing memory leak. Denial of service through memory exhaustion. This vulnerability was patched in versions(s) 1.26.3, 1.25.8, 1.24.9, 1.23.11.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceEnvoy's HTTP/2 codec leaks header maps and bookkeeping structures when receiving RST_STREAM immediately followed by GOAWAY frames from an upstream server. In nghttp2, cleanup of pending requests due to GOAWAY skips de-allocation of the bookkeeping structure and pending compressed header because the error return code path is taken when the connection is already marked for not sending more requests, leaving the clean-up code unreachable.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data< 1.23.11>= 1.24.0, < 1.24.9>= 1.25.0, < 1.25.8>= 1.26.0, < 1.26.3< 1.55.1CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- None
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- None
- Integrity
- None
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify installed Envoy versionRun 'envoy --version' or check the Docker/service metadata for the deployed Envoy versionAffected if The version falls into any of these ranges: < 1.23.11, >= 1.24.0 and < 1.24.9, >= 1.25.0 and < 1.25.8, or >= 1.26.0 and < 1.26.3
-
Identify nghttp2 version linked to Envoy or standaloneRun 'ldd $(which envoy) | grep nghttp2' to find the linked library, then check the library file version, or check nghttp2 --version if installed separatelyAffected if nghttp2 version is present and is < 1.55.1
-
Verify HTTP/2 upstream configurationReview Envoy configuration files (yaml/json) for upstream cluster definitions with 'http2' or 'http/2' protocol settings, or check if 'http2_protocol_options' is configuredAffected if Envoy is configured to use HTTP/2 for upstream connections - the vulnerability only triggers when receiving RST_STREAM followed by GOAWAY from an upstream server
You are affected if you are running a vulnerable Envoy or nghttp2 version AND have HTTP/2 enabled for upstream connections that could receive the specific frame sequence (RST_STREAM then GOAWAY) from backend servers.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scoped1.23.111.24.91.25.8
Upgrade Envoy to patched versions 1.26.3, 1.25.8, 1.24.9, or 1.23.11 (or later) to remediate the memory leak that can cause denial of service through memory exhaustion.
1.26.3 (latest stable fix for 1.26.x branch)
- 1. Identify current Envoy version using `envoy --version` or checking the deployment manifests
- 2. Determine the appropriate upgrade version based on current version: if < 1.23.11 upgrade to 1.23.11; if >= 1.24.0 and < 1.24.9 upgrade to 1.24.9; if >= 1.25.0 and < 1.25.8 upgrade to 1.25.8; if >= 1.26.0 and < 1.26.3 upgrade to 1.26.3
- 3. If using nghttp2 as a dependency, also upgrade nghttp2 to version 1.55.1 or later
- 4. Test the upgrade in a staging environment before production deployment
- 5. Deploy the upgraded Envoy version
- 6. Monitor memory usage to confirm the leak is resolved
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation2.0 h
- Testing3.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,512.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-35945 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-35945 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data