CVE-2023-36556
Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.
NVD · uneditedAn incorrect authorization vulnerability [CWE-863] in FortiMail webmail version 7.2.0 through 7.2.2, version 7.0.0 through 7.0.5 and below 6.4.7 allows an authenticated attacker to login on other users accounts from the same web domain via crafted HTTP or HTTPs requests.
Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.
dbcve analysis · high confidenceFortiMail webmail contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability (CWE-863) that allows an authenticated attacker to impersonate other users within the same web domain by sending crafted HTTP/HTTPS requests. This represents horizontal privilege escalation where a user can access another user's mailboxes or session.
Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.
Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.
NVD · CPE data>= 6.0.0, <= 6.0.12>= 6.2.0, <= 6.2.9>= 6.4.0, <= 6.4.7>= 7.0.0, <= 7.0.5= 7.2.0= 7.2.1= 7.2.2CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.
From the vector- Attack vector
- Network
- Complexity
- Low
- Privileges
- Low
- User interaction
- None
- Scope
- Unchanged
- Confidentiality
- High
- Integrity
- High
- Availability
- High
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.
dbcve checksWork through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.
-
Identify FortiMail versionAccess the FortiMail administrative interface or CLI and retrieve the firmware version. In the web UI, this is typically found under System > Maintenance > Status or via the 'get system status' CLI command.Affected if The installed version falls within these ranges: 6.0.0-6.0.12, 6.2.0-6.2.9, 6.4.0-6.4.7, 7.0.0-7.0.5, or 7.2.0-7.2.2
-
Confirm webmail interface is enabledCheck the FortiMail configuration to determine if the webmail service (HTTP/HTTPS) is active. In the web UI, this is typically configured under Domain > Settings or Mail Settings > Webmail. Alternatively, use the CLI command 'show system interface' or check service bindings.Affected if The webmail HTTP or HTTPS service is enabled and accessible
-
Verify network accessibility of webmailDetermine if the webmail interface is exposed to untrusted networks. Check firewall policies, interface bindings, and access control lists that permit external or untrusted user access to FortiMail ports 80, 443, or configured webmail ports.Affected if The webmail interface is reachable from networks outside the trusted administrative or user pool
-
Review webmail user session configurationExamine the webmail domain configuration and session management settings. In the FortiMail UI, check Domain > Settings for the relevant domain and verify session handling parameters. Look for settings that control cross-user mailbox access within the same domain.Affected if Webmail domains are configured and users can authenticate to access their mailboxes
You are affected if your FortiMail version is in the affected list (6.0.0-6.0.12, 6.2.0-6.2.9, 6.4.0-6.4.7, 7.0.0-7.0.5, or 7.2.0-7.2.2) AND the webmail interface is enabled and accessible to users within your environment.
Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.
Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.
dbcve · scopedUpgrade FortiMail to version 7.2.3, 7.0.6, or 6.4.7 or later to obtain the vendor patch. Additionally, restrict network access to the webmail interface to trusted users to reduce attack surface.
6.0.13+, 6.2.10+, 6.4.8+, 7.0.6+, or 7.2.3+ depending on current branch
- Identify the currently installed FortiMail version from the FortiMail web UI (System > Dashboard > Status) or CLI (get system status).
- Determine which version branch (6.0.x, 6.2.x, 6.4.x, 7.0.x, or 7.2.x) the current installation falls into based on the affected versions list.
- For FortiMail 6.0.x: Upgrade to version 6.0.13 or later.
- For FortiMail 6.2.x: Upgrade to version 6.2.10 or later.
- For FortiMail 6.4.x: Upgrade to version 6.4.8 or later.
- For FortiMail 7.0.x: Upgrade to version 7.0.6 or later.
- For FortiMail 7.2.x: Upgrade to version 7.2.3 or later.
- Download the appropriate firmware from the Fortinet Customer Support Portal (https://support.fortinet.com).
Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.
- Consultation2.0 h
- Implementation8.0 h
- Testing6.0 h
- Review / QA2.0 h
An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $4,960.
Scan for this in your stack
Free · runs locallyCheck whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36556 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.
References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.
Primary sourcesPractitioner notes
ContributedPeer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36556 in production — separate from our analysis above.
The advisory tells you what broke. It rarely tells you what actually worked. If you’ve dealt with this one, that detail is what the next engineer is searching for.
- The version that genuinely resolved it — not the one the vendor claimed
- A config change or rule that shut the vector down
- A gotcha in the upgrade path that cost you an afternoon
No notes yet
Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.
A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.
- Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
- Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
- No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
- No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data