Debian LinuxOperating system · Debian

CVE-2023-36664

HIGH · 7.8 CVSS v3.1 Published 2023-06-25
Fix available
A fix is available. Upgrade to after 10.01.2 or later.
See remediation →
81/100
Remediation priority · High
No privileges

Official description Straight from the sourceThe vendor's or NVD's own wording, published unedited. Authoritative, but often terse — it says what broke, rarely what to do.

NVD · unedited
Artifex Ghostscript through 10.01.2 mishandles permission validation for pipe devices (with the %pipe% prefix or the | pipe character prefix).

Technical summary Written by usOur analysis, written from the advisory, the CVSS vector and the affected-version data. It adds context the advisory leaves out, and never invents facts that are not in the source.

dbcve analysis · moderate confidence

Ghostscript through 10.01.2 has a permission validation flaw affecting pipe devices accessed via the %pipe% prefix or | pipe character prefix, potentially allowing unauthorized command execution or bypass of security restrictions intended to limit pipe device functionality.

MitigationUpgrade to Ghostscript version 10.01.2 or later where the permission validation for pipe devices has been corrected; if pipe functionality is not required, consider disabling pipe device support in the configuration.

Verify against the referenced sources before acting — the references below are authoritative for this CVE, this summary is not.

Affected products & versions What the vendor confirmedThe version ranges the vendor confirmed as vulnerable. If your version sits inside a range here, treat yourself as exposed until you have upgraded.

NVD · CPE data
Debian LinuxOperating system
Affected:= 11.0= 12.0
FedoraOperating system
Affected:= 37= 38
GhostscriptApplication
Affected:<= 10.01.2

CVSS breakdown How the score is builtThe industry scoring standard. It rates how the flaw is reached, what it takes to exploit, and what an attacker gains — the score is derived from those, not the other way round.

From the vector
Attack vector
Local
Complexity
Low
Privileges
None
User interaction
Required
Scope
Unchanged
Confidentiality
High
Integrity
High
Availability
High

CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H

Am I affected? How to checkSteps we derive from the advisory and the affected-version data, so you can decide whether this CVE reaches your setup. They are a guide, not a scan — your own configuration is the authority.

dbcve checks

Work through these to decide whether this CVE applies to you.

  1. Check installed Ghostscript version
    Run 'gs --version' or use package manager (dpkg -l ghostscript or rpm -q ghostscript)
    Affected if Version is 10.01.2 or lower (any version through 10.01.2)
  2. Verify pipe device is accessible
    Run 'gs -dNODISPLAY -dSAFER -c "(%pipe%echo test) run"' and observe if the command executes
    Affected if The pipe device executes commands without proper permission validation (should fail or be blocked on patched versions)
  3. Inspect PostScript files for pipe device usage
    Search for '%pipe%' or '|' prefix patterns in your PostScript files, for example: grep -r '%pipe%' /path/to/postscript/files or grep -r '| ' /path/to/postscript/files
    Affected if Your Ghostscript processes handle PostScript files containing pipe device references like %pipe% or |command
  4. Check if -dSAFER mode is relied upon for security
    Review your Ghostscript invocation commands and scripts for -dSAFER flag usage, as this restriction is what the vulnerability bypasses
    Affected if Your workflows rely on -dSAFER to restrict command execution while processing untrusted PostScript input with pipe device access

You are affected if Ghostscript version is 10.01.2 or lower AND your environment processes PostScript content that uses pipe device functionality (%pipe% or | prefix), particularly when -dSAFER is intended to block such operations.

Generated from the published advisory. Verify against your own configuration.

Check your environment

Paste your version and any relevant configuration and it will be compared against the affected criteria above. Do not include secrets or credentials.

AI-assisted, checked against the advisory. Informational, not a guarantee.

Remediation Closing itWhat it takes to close this. Where a vendor fix exists we point at it; where none exists we say so plainly, and can build one. Effort estimates are scoped from the advisory, not from your codebase.

dbcve · scoped
Upgrade available Upgrade to a release after 10.01.2
Interim mitigation

Upgrade to Ghostscript version 10.01.2 or later where the permission validation for pipe devices has been corrected; if pipe functionality is not required, consider disabling pipe device support in the configuration.

Recommended fix High confidence

Ghostscript 10.02.0 or later (or distribution-specific security update containing the fix)

  1. 1. Check current Ghostscript version by running: gs --version
  2. 2. For Debian systems: Run 'apt-get update && apt-get install ghostscript' to install the latest available security update
  3. 3. For Fedora systems: Run 'dnf update ghostscript' to install the latest available security update
  4. 4. Verify the fix by running: gs --version (should show 10.02.0 or later)
  5. 5. Test that pipe functionality still works as expected with your workflows
Caveat Minor: Some legacy pipe functionality behaviors may have changed as part of the permission validation fix; test critical workflows

Generated from the published advisory — verify against the referenced sources before acting.

Fix this in Debian Linux Scoped from the published advisory
  • Consultation2.0 h
  • Implementation2.0 h
  • Testing4.0 h
  • Review / QA2.0 h
10.0 hours of engineering $1,720
Get the upgrade done

An estimate, not a bill — we confirm scope with you before any work starts. Need it this week? Rush from $2,752.

Scan for this in your stack

Free · runs locally
dbcve dependency scanner

Check whether your project pulls in CVE-2023-36664 — or any other known-vulnerable package — straight from your lock files. Free and open source; it runs locally and uploads nothing.

References Go to the primary sourcePrimary sources — vendor advisories, patches and trackers. Where our summary and a reference disagree, the reference wins.

Primary sources

Practitioner notes

Contributed

Peer-ranked notes from engineers who’ve handled CVE-2023-36664 in production — separate from our analysis above.

No notes yet

Be the first to add a field note for this CVE — a mitigation you’ve verified, a version caveat, or a link to a working fix. Sign in above to contribute.

What this is

A place for practitioners to share what actually worked: a mitigation you’ve tested, a configuration change, a version- or environment-specific caveat, or a link to a verified patch. The most useful notes rise to the top as peers upvote them, so the signal stays high.

What belongs here
  • Verified mitigations, workarounds, and config changes
  • Version or environment caveats, and links to real fixes
  • No weaponised exploit code, or anything meant to cause harm
  • No spam, self-promotion, credentials, or personal data